On Feb 18, 2020, at 07:28, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
Clem Cole <clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
ditroff was always >>open source<<
and any licensee could get it and see
it. The problem you are suggesting is that it was not >>free<< i.e. FOSS.
I don't like your use of "open source"; it is way out of skew with
how it's used today.