15 Dec
2024
15 Dec
'24
4:05 p.m.
Google ran on Perforce in the early days, then on an internal
reimplementation that could scale better (long story). I believe that's
still the case, as git continues to be desired by the users but unworkable
as the core repo at the required scale. Clever hackery allows git to feel
like it's being used, but it's all above what was at least at one time
Perforce.
My info could well be out of date, though.
-rob
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 8:44 PM G. Branden Robinson <
g.branden.robinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
At 2024-12-15T07:22:29+0000, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I note that that's longer than MS-DOS was a commercial product.
People seem mighty quick to use words like "irrelevant" or "failure"
as
a substitute for reasoned argument.
Maybe I would, in fact, hate using Multics. But I can't forget that
well after Unix had fledged, its developers at CSRC found it necessary
and/or desirable to borrow back a Multics concept: they named it mmap().
Not having been concieved as desirable from the start, it was grafted
on, with negative consequences. The archives of this list feature
multiple war stories from Larry McVoy about how, as I recollect,
unifying the buffer cache was a dragon that bedeviled every version of
Unix until SunOS 4 finally slayed it. (Have I got that right?)
And promptly got chucked overboard for a System V kernel because that's
how glorious the software industry is.
Regards,
Branden
But yet, there's no question that Multics
was a commercial failure
By which metric? Honest question. Multics seems to have been in
business around 1975-2000, but I don't know if it was in the read or
in the black.