I can second that. At the time I was asking about an OS suitable for my
brand-new 486 while I was at the U of Canterbury NZ, I was told I'd need to get
an AT&T license for BSD, and those cost a king's ransom.
Does anybody have copies of the kind of legal guff AT&T put these universities
through? It would make interesting reading.
Wesley Parish
Quoting Arno Griffioen <arno.griffioen(a)ieee.org>:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:22PM +1100, Greg
'groggy' Lehey wrote:
load it.
Which is sort of funny because it was not particularly
secret between most BSD users.
Given that the first person he mentions in the article is Bruce
Evans,
it's difficult to understand how he
hadn't heard of it.
Have to keep in mind that Linus was at the time of course a student in
Finland, so outside the USA.
Outside the USA such BSD (or other *IX) source-code access on
universities
and technical schools was not common is my personal experience.
At that time I was a student too and apart from MINIX there really was
little to no *IX source access available to anyone (BSD or otherwise)
unless
for very specific research applications and needing to sign all sorts of
NDA
stuff.
Buying a BSD license was way outside a student's budget at that time
and universities were not very forthcoming in giving them access.
As a result MINIX was actually making quite a few strides to get more
complex, but Andrew Tanenbaum always actively resisted turning it into a
'production' system as he wanted to retain it as an educational tool
(and the license agreement was quite limited to this purpose) pushing a
lot of european hackers towards this initially very rudimentary minix
userland-compatible new little kernel made by some finnish dude ;)
Quite a few strong discussions between Linus and Andrew at the time
on Usenet in comp.os.minix about the monolithic vs. microkernel
ideas.
Bye, Arno.
"I have supposed that he who buys a Method means to learn it." - Ferdinand Sor,
Method for Guitar
"A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on." -- Samuel
Goldwyn