4 May
2008
4 May
'08
3:27 a.m.
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:16:23AM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
Confusingly, the 1e manual for /dev/rk0 says its an RK03. I'll have to go
read the DEC manuals, but I would guess that the RK11 drive and interface is
the same, but the RK03 and RK05 removable disk packs were of different
storage capacity.
Warren
We may not
need mount afterall. The init process mounts /dev/rk0 on
/usr during startup (after the second "1:" label on e12-01).
Oh, for what its worth, the init sources say its an "rk05" disk
("rko5"
actually ;-) I think Warren was asking about which model to use earlier.