16 Mar
2021
16 Mar
'21
12:47 a.m.
Bakul Shah wrote in
<01BE1B3F-8745-4465-93EF-95AA83EFD494(a)iitbombay.org>:
Wonderful, i can re-answer in public, too, leaving something off.
--- Forwarded from Bakul Shah <bakul(a)iitbombay.org> ---
Maybe because alternate processing rips myself off. Sigh.
...
|Oh. Hm. I heard this on American Forces
|Network, told by Tony Scott, to which i listened from at least
|Monday to Thursday 00am to 04am (German Time). When such things
|were still possible, and thus in the first days, maybe the day it
|happened. (Before "Max" was taken offline after Tony Scott issued
|several "You can't say that on the radio", for sure.)
He surely did for years before that. But i mean, hey, just an
observation, i have no idea of american sensitivities.
|But thanks for the pointer. Haven't we had this already in the
|past? The above sounds dark and ugly to my ears, hmmmm.
Yeah i mean, this arose by the beginning of the 90s, right.
If the first examination does not reveal the desired result (but
maybe the truth even, heh), then just perform a second .. a third
one, until the result is absolutely what was wanted. Gulf war
illness, Barschel's death, W keys on the keyboard .. you name it.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)