[TUHS] 68000 vs. 8086 ( was Algol68 vs. C at Bell Labs)

My memory was that the 68000 gave the 8086 a pretty good run for its money, but when Moto came out with a memory management chip it had some severe flaws that made paging and fault recovery impossible, while the equivalent features available on the 8086 line were tolerable. There were some bizarre attempts to page with the 68000 (I remember one product that had two 68000 chips, one of which was solely to sit on the shoulder of the other and remember enough information to respond to faults!). By the time Moto fixed it, the 8086 had taken the field... I got a lot more respect for the 8086 architecture when working at Transmeta. The instruction set encoding means that programs are small, and that means that, for a given icache size, the cache hit rate was much better than for our (wide word) machine. By the time we had upped the size of our caches, the increased area and cost made our chip much less competitive.