19 Jan
2023
19 Jan
'23
9:15 p.m.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 16:03, Warner Losh <imp(a)bsdimp.com> wrote:
FWIW, in the last year, I've reviewed FreeBSD, OpenBSD (twice), NetBSD
and DragonflyBSD.
The Dragonfly team contacted me and owned the problems I had. They
don't test against VirtualBox.
For the others, various admirers complained in the comments, or by
email, or by social media, or combinations thereof, and nobody but
nobody went "oh, you're right, that _is_ a problem, we should look at
that."
There's an ongoing "spirited discussion" ;-) on Twitter right now with
me, Frank Leonhardt, and Eugene Markow.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven(a)cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lproven(a)gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
UK: (+44) 7939-087884 ~ Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053
More importantly, though, it retained much of the
structure of the original AT&T code, especailly in the kernel. So if you understood
the BSD code, you'd understand the System V code and vice versa at least at a gross
level.
I believe I was in the audience for your FOSDEM talk on this matter. :-)
I hope to
return to the subject of the BSDs in general on the Reg in future.
That would be cool...