25 Jun
2018
25 Jun
'18
6:52 p.m.
On 2018-06-25 01:15, arnold(a)skeeve.com wrote:
Dave Horsfall <dave(a)horsfall.org> wrote:
Sieve[0] is what I've seen suggested a bit. I've skimmed over the docs
some, but haven't invested the time in figuring out how much effort
would be involved in replacing procmail with it, at first glance, it
does not seem to be a drop-in replacement.
--
Michael Parson
Pflugerville, TX
KF5LGQ
[0] http://sieve.info/
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Michael Parson wrote:
So what is the alternative? I've been using it for years with
a pretty static setup to route incoming mail to different places.
I need *something* to do what it does. The first rule in my .procmailrc does this with
formail:
Anyone with any concept of security will not be running Procmail; it's
not
even supported by its author any more, due to its opaque syntax and
likely
vulnerabilities (it believes user-supplied headers and runs shell
commands
based upon them).
-- Dave VK2KFU