Good time of day folks, I often ponder on people's attachments to pixels on the
screen that come about by clicking *this* icon and typing in a box surrounded by blue and
with an icon in position <xyz> vs pixels on the screen that come about instead by
opening that application that is a black border with a little paper airplane button in the
bottom right vs....etc.
To make it more clear, I find myself often confused at people treating email different
from SMS different from social media DMs different from forum posts different from some
other mechanism that like literally all the others is pixels arranged into glyphs on a
screen conveying an approximation of human speech. This difference among these different
ways to send said pixels to people has eluded me all my life despite working with
technology since I was a tot.
What this has me curious on is if in the early days of UNIX there were attempts at
suggesting which provided communication mechanisms were appropriate for what. For instance
something that smells of:
It is appropriate to use mail(1) to send a review of a piece of work vs it is appropriate
to use write(1) to ask Jim if he wants to take a lunch break before the big meeting. Did
this matter to people back then like it seems to now? To me it's just pixels on a
screen that are there when I look at them and aren't when I don't.
Truth be told I am hoping to learn something from this because I only do a couple email
lists and web forums, my social life generally does not involve SMS, phone calls, nor
social media. Where it has become tedious is someone I meet who seems to want to
communicate over pixels on screens is then put off when I provide them an email address,
usually asking instead if I have a Facebook or whatever the kids are calling Twitters
today. The few times I've tried to explain email will be me transmitting you
communication as pixel glyphs on a screen just like anything else would be me transmitting
you communication as pixel glyphs on the screen, this doesn't diffuse their concerns
any, they then just think there is something wrong with me for comparing words as pixels
on a screen to words as pixels on a screen. Granted, I've probably avoided plenty of
vapid people this way, but it feels like it's becoming more and more expected that
"these pixels on the screen in *this* program are only for this and those pixels on
the screen in *that* program are only for that".
Is this a recent phenomenon? Has communication over electronic means always had these
arbitrary limitations hoisted on it by the humans that use it? Or did people not give a
hoot what you sent over what program and actually cared more about the words you're
saying than the word you typed at a terminal to then be able to transmit words? I doubt
what I learn is going to royally change my approach to allowing technology in my irl
social life, but it would be nice to at least have more mental ammo when someone asks to
be friends online and then gives me mad sideeye when I go "sure here's my email
address!"
- Matt G.