12 Oct
2017
12 Oct
'17
4:16 p.m.
The version of the embarrassing memo on the University of Virginia CS415 reading list that
I linked to is an email response from the author Tom Davis, posted to
comp.sys.next.advocacy on 25 Apr 1994, which includes his extremely interesting inline
comments that he added after the memo was leaked, following up about what happened at SGI
in response to the leak!
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs415/reading/irix-bloat.txt
<http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs415/reading/irix-bloat.txt>
SGI the institution was embarrassed, but I don’t think Tom Davis has anything to be
embarrassed about personally: he handled it well and honestly, told the unvarnished truth
to management, which had a positive effect, and his candid write-up and response now
serves as a great example for students learning how things work in the real world!
It should be required reading in all computer science programs (and management programs
too)!
-Don
On 12 Oct 2017, at 16:00, Larry McVoy
<lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
I strongly suspect it was true, Tom Davis was an SGI employee as
were the other people mentioned.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:04:43PM +0100, Michael-John Turner wrote:
Hi,
I came across this on Lobsters[1] today and thought it may be of interest to
the list:
http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/unix-haters/tirix/embarrassing-memo.html
It appears to be an internal SGI memo that's rather critical of IRIX 5.1.
Does anyone know if it's true?
[1] https://lobste.rs/
Cheers, MJ
--
Michael-John Turner * mj(a)mjturner.net * http://mjturner.net/
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm