20 Feb
2022
20 Feb
'22
5:34 a.m.
Terminal editing was done in general on the Blit and follow-on systems.
That's primarily why the Research shells didn't do it.
But history (ha!) chose another path.
-rob
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:20 AM Sven Mascheck <mascheck(a)in-ulm.de> wrote:
On 19.02.2022 23:39, John Cowan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 1:45 PM Rob Pike <robpike(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I undid all the macros for the v8 shell, with
Steve's blessing, before
doing the key work on that shell. But no one outside cared about any of the
research Unixes after v7,
Lots of us would have loved to care about them and were sad that we
couldn't until they were open sourced much later.
8th ed sh (about '84) brought quite a few changes and fixes. Just naming a
few:
- environment variable HISTORY, pointing to a writable file, providing a
history mechanism by means of "=(1)"
- type is replaced by whatis, which produces output that can be
re-evaluated by the shell
- functions can be exported, in the same ways like variables
keyword history: I always imagined that the Bourne shell would have been
in much wider use even nowadays, if only it had provided line editing and a
history at some point. Why not? Even Kenneth Almquist released his
SVR4-like reimplementation intentionally without history. All that might
have been implemented more elegant directly in the terminal I/O instead of
in every program? (that is, not in a MS-DOS-like way, where every program
even needs its own pager).
I still wonder if it would be possible to properly provide line editing
and history in the terminal I/O in general.
Sven