Re: [TUHS] History of chown semantics

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry McVoy <lm(a)bitmover.com> wrote: Amen. Brian - thank you for explaining from where the feature came. It makes more sense to be that issue that cause it was clearly the small number of UID the incorrect use of GIDs and groups. A fix to UID was later implemented in the other editions, and I expect if PWB had done it earlier - dmr et al would have "bought back" that one also. While I'm glad to hear the explanation. I admit that do not buy the IBM programmer stuff. I know for a fair number of us, from friend wnj, the late Ted Kowalski (aka frodo) to many of us others programmed on TSS, MTS as well as other IBM systems before UNIX. The concept of file give-away still seems far fetched as an explanation of it helped the user base. Greg's example if his wife were in his group and it was properly used, its not an issue (all of my family are included in group "ccc" on our all systems at home and I do exactly the same thing). Brian said - "proper use of group ids." -- I think its going to be hard to convince a number of us that file give-away is a good idea when you have groups. Frankly, I think it violated Mash's own "small" change directive - as we have together pointed out it has so many side effects. The times where it actually might be helpful seems pretty small and all of those case so far that we can think of there are better solutions already baked into UNIX. The negatives of a file give-away feature (at least to me and I suspect many if us who find it distasteful) are so many. All that said -- the mystery and original Tim question that started this thread has been answered... thank you all. Source -- PWB (1.0) Why - seems to be it solved an issue with how UID/GIDS were used in practice in the PWB world. IMO: it's to bad it got baked in SVID and POSIX when we had other solutions the problems that needed to be solved. But clearly others such as Brian and Greg like it. Surely there is no accounting for taste ;-) Clem