6 Mar
2021
6 Mar
'21
2:52 a.m.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 6:18 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> wrote:
On Friday, 5 March 2021 at 10:32:15 -0500, Theodore
Ts'o wrote:
Oops, that's what I get for reading messages sequentially :-( But in
this case it's for small values of 10.
We set this to 1% at Netflix and fill to about ~98-99% full over UFS. This
works well as we don't have small files. SATA Flash we keep a bit more
empty, but that's due to its crappy FLT liking more free space...
Warner
Greg
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:50:32AM -0800, John
Gilmore wrote:
> John P. Linderman <jpl.jpl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have several 12 TB disks scattered about my house. 5% of 12TB is
600GB.
At one point in hystery, ext2 performance was reported to suffer badly
if there was less than 5% of disk space available in an active
filesystem. My naive belief, probably informed by older and wiser heads
around Sun, was that when the file system was >95% full, ext2 spent a
lot of time seeking around in free lists finding single allocatable
blocks. And there were no built-in "defragmentation" programs that
could easily fix that.
I'll point out that BSD FFS, at least in BSD 4.3, reserves 10% of the
file system for reserved blocks. --
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog(a)lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA