6 Apr
2017
6 Apr
'17
4:20 a.m.
Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious
wars
I always imagined NJ being more vi.
I would be very much surprised if jim/sam was not the editor
of choice (apart from Ken Thompson who seemed content with
'ed').
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jason Stevens <
jsteve(a)superglobalmegacorp.com> wrote:
I suppose that it would make sense that all of
AT&T's leading edge
projects would use research Unix. I've always heard of the original C++ to
C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it.
It doesn't look like it had the wide scale following that C or Fortan had
at this point.
Sadly my experience with C++ was mostly tied to Borland on the micro in
early 90's, which makes it look mature compared to these early versions.
It's great finding stuff like this in the tree hiding in plain sight, if
only you know what to look for. (http://unix.superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-
bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/cfront/?cvsroot=rv9)
Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars I always imagined
NJ being more vi.
Thanks again for making this release happen!
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.