31 Aug
2017
31 Aug
'17
8:20 a.m.
> The last I can probably answer. Early ls -l
would only list the user
> name not the group.
This I knew.
Yep; you had to say "ls -lg" to get the
group.
And this too. V7 ls is this way.
But I would have thought by the V10 timeframe that ls -l would also
have shown the group, and I was wondering what group (group name)
that would have been.
It's not that important.
Thanks to everyone who answered,
Arnold