Re: [TUHS] A question about ls(1)

Bakul Shah: This could've been avoided if there was a convention about where to store per user per app settings & possibly state. On one of my Unix machines I have over 200 dotfiles. ==== Some, I think including Ken and Dennis, might have argued that real UNIX programs aren't complex enough to need lots of configuration files. Agree with it or not, that likely explains why the Research stream never supplied a better convention about where to store such files. I do remember some general debate in the community (e.g. on netnews) about the matter back in the early 1980s. One suggestion I recall was to move all the files to subdirectory `$HOME/...'. Personally I think $HOME/conf would have been better (though I lean toward the view that very few programs should need such files anyway). But by then BSD had spread the convention of leaving `hidden' files in $HOME had spread too far to call back. It wouldn't surprise me if some at Berkeley would rather have moved to a cleaner convention, just as the silly uucp-baud-rate flags were removed from wc, but the cat was already out of the bag and too hard to stuff back in. On the Ubuntu Linux systems I help run these days, there is a directory $HOME/.config. The tree within has 192 directories and 187 regular files. I have no idea what all those files are for, but from the names, most are from programs I may have run once years ago to test something, or from programs I run occasionally but have no context I care about saving. The whole tree occupies almost six megabytes, which seems small by current standards, but (as those on this list certainly know) in the early 1980s it was possible to run a complete multi-user UNIX system comfortably from a single 2.5MB RK05 disk. Norman Wilson Toronto ON