4 Mar
2024
4 Mar
'24
7:19 a.m.
Did `learn` have a regex module? (my memory* does not suffice, and I didn't even
manage to get google to tell me if it were learn(1) or learn(6), so please forgive the
imprecision of this response)
-Dave
* although I do recall this was how I learned one of ed(1) or vi(1)
On 4 Mar 2024, at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek via TUHS
<tuhs(a)tuhs.org> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 07:03:39PM -0700, Marc Rochkind wrote:
Will, here's my recollection, when I got to
UNIX in late 1972 or
thereabouts:
First, there was ed. grep and sed were derived from ed, so came along
later. awk came along way later.
There were only manual pages. You typed "man ed" and there it was. The man
pages were very accurate, very clear, and very authoritative. Many found
them too succinct, especially as UNIX got more popular, but all of us back
in the day found them perfect. Maybe you had to read the man page a few
times to understand it, but at least that's all you had to read. No need to
hunt around for more documentation!
(Well, there was more documentation: The source code, which was all online.
But reading the ed source to understand regular expressions was impossible.
It was in assembler, and Ken was generating code on the fly as the
expression was compiled.)
I like to add that there was also quite a large set of additional
documentatiomn (Volume 2, Voilume 1 were the man pages), which
includes "Advanced Editing on UNIX" giving many examples on the use of
regexes in ed(1).
I do remeber reading a lot from Volume 2, as CS students in Amsterdam
we received printed and bound copies of both Volume 1 and 2. So in my
case, "only man pages or source" is not true. Having paper versions
was importent, because access to terminals for students was limited
(until I became a teaching assistent, which came with privileges,
including 24h access to terminals)
-Otto
>
> Also, it should be noted that ed produced a single error message: a
> question mark. No wasting of teletype paper!
>
> The motivation for learning regular expressions was that that's how you
> edited files. ed was the only game in town.
>
> (sh used a greatly restricted form of regular expressions, which were
> documented on the sh man page.)
>
> Marc Rochkind
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 6:31 PM Will Senn <will.senn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was wondering, what were the best early sources of information for
>> regexes and why did folks need to know them to use unix? In my recent
>> explorations, I have needed to have a better understanding of them, so I'm
>> digging in... awk's my most recent thing and it's deeply associated
with
>> them, so here we are. I went to the bookshelf to find something appropriate
>> and as usual, I've traced to primary sources to some extent. I started with
>> Mastering Regular Expressions by Friedl, and I won't knock it (it's one
of
>> the bestsellers in our field), but it's much to long for my personal taste
>> and it's not quite as systematic as I would like (the author himself notes
>> that his interests are less technical than authors preceding him on the
>> subject). So, back to the shelves... Bourne's, The Unix Environment, and
>> Kernighan & Pike's, The Unix Programming Evironment both talk about them
in
>> the context of grep, ed, sed, and awk. Going further back, the Unix
>> Programmer's Manual v7 - ed, grep, sed, awk...
>>
>> After digging around it seems like folks needed regexes for ed, grep, sed
>> and awk... and any other utility that leveraged the wonderful nature of
>> these handy expressions. Fine. Where did folks go learn them? Was there a
>> particularly good (succinct and accurate) source of information that folks
>> kept handy? I'm imagining (based on what I've seen) that someone might
cut
>> out the ed discussion or the grep pages of the manual and tape them to
>> their monitors, but maybe I'm stooopid and they didn't need no
stinkin'
>> memory device for regexes - surely they're intuitive enough that even a
>> simpleton could pick them up after seeing a few examples... but if that
>> were really the case, Friedl's book would have been a flop and it
wasn't
>> :). So seriously, if you remember that far back - what was the definitive
>> source of your regex knowledge and what were the first motivators for
>> learning them?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Will
>>
>
>
> --
> *My new email address is mrochkind(a)gmail.com <mrochkind(a)gmail.com>*