On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Bakul Shah <bakul(a)bitblocks.com> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:44:48 -0800 Larry McVoy
<lm(a)mcvoy.com> wrote:
Larry McVoy writes:
It's a bummer because BSD brings minimalism to the table. You can run
a BSD machine in 128MB and it works. Hell, it used to work great in 4MB.
I think this is the crux of the issue. As a group gets bigger,
minimalism is hard to maintain. To have a fighting chance you
have inculcate new people in the same minimalism culture and
that takes time. This puts a higher bar to entry.
Though even in the early days of Linux, it could run in a slightly smaller
footprint. It just grew more quickly than BSD, though retained a better way
to subset that let it retain much of the lower end that BSD had grown too
large for for many years.
The BSD stuff isn't being taken seriously because
the BSD people aren't
interested in taking new people seriously. Which
is a shame because the
work that Netflix and other BSD people have done is really cool.
If you think what BSD folks have done is cool, just join in.
Why not ignore the personalities and the popularity contest.
Honestly, most of the heavy BSD contributors do just that. There's drama
here and there, but it's mostly away from larger contributors... And so it
goes...
Regardless of how we got here, the reality is that BSD
at this
point has a tiny footprint in the market. Even Linux has a
small footprint in the desktop + laptop market, compared to
Windows and Mac. BSD isn't even counted separately any more
there. In the server market Linux is basically it. In the
cloud market it is mostly Linux (almost all of it, if you
don't count Azure). In the Mobile+desktop+laptop market, other
than Android, Linux is under 1%. BSD numbers are just in the
noise.
Yet, according to Sandvine, Netflix serves 35% of peak internet traffic,
all from FreeBSD. Go figure :)
The reality is that BSD just doesn't matter to
most folks. The
same with minimalism. So it goes. [And neither fact matters to
me for my non-pay work.]
Warner