TUHS

tuhs@tuhs.org

16 participants
6536 discussions

Start a nNew thread

DMD 5620 mouse available

by arnold＠skeeve.com

... at a rather high price: https://www.ebay.com/itm/265518759380?hash=item3dd226bdd4:g:8gUAAOSwW21h8N7… :-) Arnold

1 year, 6 months

PDP-7 and Interdata 8/32 Bell System UNIX Installations?

by segaloco

Are there any documented or remembered instances PDP-7 or Interdata 8/32 UNIX being installed on any such machines for use in the Bell System aside from their original hosts? Along similar lines, was the mention of PDP-7 UNIX also supporting the PDP-9 based solely on consistencies in the architecture or did this early version of UNIX actually get bootstrapped on a real PDP-9 at some point? My understanding of the pre-3B-and-VAX landscape of UNIX in the Bell System is predominantly PDP-11 systems, but there was also work in the late 70s regarding 8086 hosts as evidenced in some BSTJ and other publications, and there is the System/370 work (Holmdel?) which I don't know enough about to say whether it technically starts before or after UNIX touches the VAX. Thanks for any info! - Matt G.

1 year, 6 months

Off topic: BSD timezone function vs. POSIX timezone variable

by Aharon Robbins

Hi All. This is a bit off-topic, but people here are likely to know the answer. V7 had a timzone function: char *timezone(int zone, int dst); that returned a timezone name. POSIX has a timezone variable which is the offset in seconds from UTC. The man pages for all of {Net,Free,Open}BSD seem to indicate that both are available on those systems. My question is, how? The declarations for both are given as being in <time.h>. But don't the symbols in libc.a conflict with each other? How does a programmer on *BSD choose which version of timezone they will get? Feel free to reply privately. Thanks, Arnold

1 year, 6 months

Loud machines (was Compatibility Question)

by Douglas McIlroy

> Paul -- you left out the other "feature" -- the noise, which was still deafening even with a model N1 and its cover. It was indeed loud, but GE out-roared them with a blindingly fast card reader. The machine had a supposedly gentle touch; it grabbed cards with vacuum rather than tongs. But the make-and-break pneumatic explosions sounded like a machine gun. A noise meter I borrowed from the Labs' tool crib read 90db 6 feet away. Doug

1 year, 6 months

Compatibility question

by KenUnix

I have been working with a VAX780 sim running Unix System V r2 VAX780 and am having strange issues. TERM is defined at vt100 When firing up vi at times the cursor is positioned in the wrong place or when inserting text it over writes areas on the screen. I have tried vt100, vt100-am, vt100-nam and none work as expected. Any ideas? Thanks -Ken Happy holidays -- WWL 📚

1 year, 6 months

Re: PDP-7 and Interdata 8/32 Bell System UNIX Installations?

by segaloco

Thanks Ken! I hadn't, even considered the PDP-15. Looks like SimH supports it, that could make for an interesting project... - Matt G. On Monday, December 18th, 2023 at 6:12 PM, Ken Thompson <kenbob(a)gmail.com> wrote: > the pdp-7 was run on the almost compatible > pdp-9 and pdp-15 computers. > i dont think that version of unix ever made > it out of the research department. > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 5:54 PM segaloco via TUHS <tuhs(a)tuhs.org> wrote: > >> Are there any documented or remembered instances PDP-7 or Interdata 8/32 UNIX being installed on any such machines for use in the Bell System aside from their original hosts? Along similar lines, was the mention of PDP-7 UNIX also supporting the PDP-9 based solely on consistencies in the architecture or did this early version of UNIX actually get bootstrapped on a real PDP-9 at some point? >> >> My understanding of the pre-3B-and-VAX landscape of UNIX in the Bell System is predominantly PDP-11 systems, but there was also work in the late 70s regarding 8086 hosts as evidenced in some BSTJ and other publications, and there is the System/370 work (Holmdel?) which I don't know enough about to say whether it technically starts before or after UNIX touches the VAX. >> >> Thanks for any info! >> >> - Matt G.

1 year, 6 months

Re: Compatibility question

by David Arnold

> On 17 Dec 2023, at 13:02, KenUnix <ken.unix.guy(a)gmail.com> wrote: -8<— > I have tried vt100, vt100-am, vt100-nam and none > work as expected. I have a long-ago recollection that using vt100 had rendering issues with emacs, but vt102 was fine. Maybe worth a shot? d

1 year, 6 months

Sad news: Bell Labs leaving Murray Hill.

by Dan Cross

I'm sure this is already known, but Nokia is relocating Bell Labs to New Brunswick. Goodbye, Unix Room! https://www.roi-nj.com/2023/12/08/real_estate/nokia-bell-labs-is-moving-to-… - Dan C.

1 year, 7 months

Possible Moment of u_man/a_man Split

by segaloco

Somewhere between UNIX Release 3.0 and Release 4.1, a portion of the User's Manual was split off into a separate Administrator's Manual, leading to a reordering of the sections among other things. In the directories, these pieces would be placed in u_man and a_man respectively. There may be some evidence of the manual being intact as of 4.0 or at least not completely separated. I've found consistently that references to manpages in the Documents for UNIX Release 4.0 collection follow their pre-split numbering and all refer to the User's Manual. The catch is that all references are to the UNIX User's Manual Release 3.0, so this may not point conclusively to the state of /usr/man on disk at the time. The Release 4.1 Administrator's Manual hasn't turned up yet but the User's Manual reflects the renumbering and is less the a_man pages. To complete the circle, the various Release 5.0 revisions of the documents do refer to the Administrator's Manual where appropriate. Was the manual getting split up of any great shock or was it to be expected as the software grew? It would come to happen again between SysV and SVR2 with p_man. Out of curiosity I checked how my own manpage set is organized, it seems to be of the research order, with special files in section 4 rather than section 7 for instance. I've never studied how far reaching the different orders are. - Matt G.

1 year, 7 months

BSTJ DMERT "Programs From Other Processors" Comment

by segaloco

In a BSTJ article[1] it is said "The availability of a simulated UNIX operating system in DMERT allows UNIX programs from other processors to execute on the 3B20D Processor." Does this just mean C programs which are rebuilt or is there some implication DMERT's particular UNIX environment featured some sort of emulation facilities? I may be reading too much into it... - Matt G. [1] - https://archive.org/details/bstj62-1-303/page/n11/mode/2up P.S. I learned I may walk past DMERT and a 3B20D most days, there's a long-operational telephone CO on my usual walk that through referencing public records I've discovered has a WECo 5ESS up in it somewhere. That's all the listing said, dunno if WECo is given as meaning an early model or just a generic name. Either way...so close yet so far, makes me ever so curious what dusty old bookshelves in that building might hold.

1 year, 7 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

TUHS