Hi, all!!!
Still trying to implement multi-user unix-learning environment.
So, I run simh with Quasijarus, when I telnet to port, that is redirected
from serial, it automatically picks up unused line, that is fine, and
eleminates a need for reconfiguration.
But there is something interesting: I want to implement possibility to
allow outgoing connections from emulated VAX. As I understand, 4.3BSD
supports SLIP protocol. And I can get SLIP working through emulated serial
line. So, the problem is:
1. How it was used to setup SLIP lines in 4.3BSD? :)
2. The other end - will slirp package work in such case?
All the best, and thanks for all help,
S.
Hi,
What version, exactly, of 6th Edition source code is contained in the Lions' commentary booklets? I took a look at the version available for download at [http://v6.cuzuco.com/v6.pdf] but it does not seem to match the source code in the TUHS archives.
If the source code was in fact modified by Lions, are there any machine-readable versions available?
Regards,
Maciek.
This is good. You can also get the straight text of the source
without the line numbers by just removing the .html suffix of the
the file (e.g try http://www.tom-yam.or.jp/2238/src/lp.c)
I cannot read Japanese so I don't know if it says how it
was produced or it's origin. But I can tell that it is not a
derivative of the PDF I produced.
-B
> Well, I found a Japanese page that seems to have the Lions-formatted V6 code available in HTML format, just in case anyone is interested:
>
> http://www.tom-yam.or.jp/2238/src/
>
> Maciek.
At this instant, there is an accessible
link at
http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=2724348
though it has some popups. A very nice story
indeed. I talked to the author (Konstantin Kakaes)
for a couple of hours in March. He really did want
to know mostly about the kind of things the article
talks about, and though the PR guy had probably told
him that I wouldn't get into things like SCO, in fact
that wasn't what he was interested in.
Dennis
Good article in the June 10th issue of the Economist
that may be of interest to TUHS members (I would have
caught it sooner, but I'm a little behind in my
reading).
Unix's founding fathers
Jun 10th 2004
From The Economist print edition
Dennis Ritchie invented C and was one of the key members of the team
behind Unix - two developments that underpin much modern software
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=S%27%2980%2EQQ7%27%23%40…
Subscription or "pay-per-view" required. I'd share the
full article, but I am afraid of their lawyers.
---corey
Shoppa wondered,
Can anyone comment about the history of the "sno" Snobol
interpreter that seems to exist in V4 (man page in the
archives gives 2/7/93 as the date) and some later
Unix versions (Sys V, V6, etc.)? In the TUHS archives
we have the V6 sources but they are remarkably comment-
free.
Was "sno" ever part of the build chain of any interesting
utilities etc?
Not that I know of; I think writing it was just a quick entertainment
for Ken. The "application" that has survived is a
1-page program that solves the Soma (or Instant Insanity)
puzzle.
Dennis
Can anyone comment about the history of the "sno" Snobol
interpreter that seems to exist in V4 (man page in the
archives gives 2/7/93 as the date) and some later
Unix versions (Sys V, V6, etc.)? In the TUHS archives
we have the V6 sources but they are remarkably comment-
free.
Was "sno" ever part of the build chain of any interesting
utilities etc?
I'm just generally curious about awk predecessors, if
anyone wants to chime in with their favorite pre-awk
string processing tools.
Tim.
Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again???
Just wondering...
Jason
Folks,
I am interested in the use of multiple system call sets in Unix systems.
I recollect that Pyramid Technology machines in the 80's allowed users
and/or processes to select whether to use BSD or SYSV system call
semantics. Also, FreeBSD supports Linux system calls and SYSV in
emulation.
Does anyone know a good location (book, article, website) that discusses
this.
thanks
dayton
Dayton Clark
CIS Department dayton(a)brooklyn.cuny.edu
Brooklyn College/CUNY 718.951.4811
Brooklyn, New York 11210 718.951.4842 (fax)
> There where several ports: Sun3, Sun4 / SPARC, DECstation, SPUR, Sequent
> Symmetry at least. Even mixed architecture clusters where supported. See
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/projects/sprite/retrospective.html
Wasn't the Symmetry a 386 based system? Could Sprite be "revived" for the
modern PC? Just wondering ...
Arnold
I think you're confused. The DECstation was made by DEC, but used a MIPS
processor, not a VAX. SIMH won't be able to do anything with it, although
there are likely other MIPS simulators out there to be found.
Arnold
> From: "Gregg C Levine" <hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net>
> To: <tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org>
> Subject: RE: [TUHS] Sprite
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:16:33 -0400
>
> Hello from Gregg C Levine
> Okay, now this begs the question: Can the VAX Station boot code which
> is targeted to that specific system, be rewritten to accommodate the
> VAX processor that SIMH emulates? I am not a good C programmer, just a
> whatever comes before that. I can only offer these suggestions, and
> ask these questions.
>
> For that matter, do any of us have any of the SUN hardware that I do
> know Sprite ran on? Or that VAX Station? For me, its no to all three.
> -------------------
> Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 07:19:19 -0500
> From: Cornelius Keck <cornelius(a)mail.keck.cx>
> To: Randy Belk <rbelk(a)onlybsd.com>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] Sprite
> Cc: tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
>
> I looked at the Berkeley repository last night, and did not
> see some files required to run Sprite directly from disk --
> for instance, the Sparc bootimage (sun4.bt or so) seems to
> be missing, or I'm overlooking it, in my coffein-deprived
> state of mind.
>
> Come to think of it.. I do have a few Sparc 2 machines, with
> a few improvements (like 128MB RAM, Weitek PowerUp), and would
> like to give Sprite a spin. I'm all for adding the Sprite ISO
> to the archive!
>
> - Cornelius
Jose' R Valverde wrote:
> > >
> > > I had the (small) pleasure to run it on a small number of
> > > DECstations back in 1994-1995 out of the freshly published
> > > WalnuCreek CD and I still long for some of it features.
Let me be confused, and note that a DECstation is not a SPARCstation.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenst(a)ucsd.edu
Jose,
TNX for parking Sprite on ftp.es.embnet.org!
I just ran into a little problem.. looks as if
the node is either down, or not reachable (at
least from here (== Plano, Texas):
$ ping ftp.es.embnet.org
PING bakalao.cnb.uam.es (150.244.80.6): 56 data bytes
^C
--- bakalao.cnb.uam.es ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
$ ftp ftp.es.embnet.org
[2 minutes later]
^C$
> generated an ISO from the raw CD and am copying now the CD
> contents to disk, which are being made available as
>
> ftp://ftp.es.embnet.org/pub/misc/TUHS/sprite
> and
> ftp://ftp.es.embnet.org/pub/misc/TUHS/sprite.iso
>
> as the copying is done. Beware, it is ~530MB.
This goes for both my machine at home, and here at work.
Now, www.es.embnet.org responds fairly fast, so I don't
think that it's the wire across the big pond. Any
ideas?
TNX!
Regards,
Cornelius
Would it make sense to add Sprite to the Unix Archives? To me, yes, it was
enough UNIX like although it wasn't ATT or BSD derived and it had many
advanced features.
I had the (small) pleasure to run it on a small number of DECstations back in
1994-1995 out of the freshly published WalnuCreek CD and I still long for some
of it features.
The distribution is still available at
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/projects/sprite/
j
--
These opinions are mine and only mine. Hey man, I saw them first!
José R. Valverde
De nada sirve la Inteligencia Artificial cuando falta la Natural
> From: Albert Cahalan <albert(a)users.sf.net>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] cvsweb for BSD
> > One of the big problems is that they move files all over the place as BSD
> > developed and CVS doen't work too elegantly with those kind of changes.
>
> Bitkeeper handles this well. I suspect that Larry McVoy would
> at least be mildly interested in giving advice for such
> a project. Bitkeeper is SCCS-based.
Yes, I'd be interested. Other than the renames I think we can automate
most of this.
> Bitkeeper also has a superior web interface. You can't beat
> standard unified diff format with a tiny bit of color added.
Thanks. One day we'll get around to adding sub line highlighting - that
would be an improvement.
> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp(a)bsdimp.com>
> Subject: Re: [TUHS] cvsweb for BSD
>
> If you are going to use a proprietary system, you might as well use
> perforce, which has better branching and file movement support than
> bitkeeper. But I guess I'm a little biased because I like p4 better
> than bk.
Both biased and incorrect. There are over 10,000 branches of the linux
kernel floating around in BitKeeper (we know, we counted them) and we
handle file movement much more nicely than perforce does (we have our
own concept of an inode, a pathname is a attribute of an inode just
like contents are an attribute of the inode - so you can move A to B,
I modify A, you pull from me and the changes apply to B in your tree.)
You can be as biased as you want, I don't want to turn this into a
SCM discussion, but try and be accurate. About the only thing that
p4 does that we don't do is centralized locking; we don't need to
do that in a distributed/replicated system but people sometimes want it.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.comhttp://www.bitkeeper.com
Maybe everyone here already knows about this, but I haven't seen
anything, so I'm posting it.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040524130757328
"We hope with this Grokline project to be able to identify any
conceivable legal issues that those wishing to block, slow, hobble or
tax GNU/Linux may try to use in future legal assaults on the community.
If there are litigation risks, even just from nuisance lawsuits,
particularly with respect to patents, we want to find those risks,
hopefully before they do, and mitigate or resolve them now. I am
personally convinced, as you no doubt are too, that the next wave of
attacks on GNU/Linux and the GPL will involve patents."
--
http://chris.nodewarrior.org/
>
>Incidentally, the Unisoft m68k port of SVR2 at the core of A/UX was also
>ported to the Perq-5 in 1986/1987, to create the Crosfield Studio 9500.
>
>Perq had just folded, but a core group of ex-Perq employees worked with a
>team from the UK company Crosfield Electronics to take the machine (which at
>that time existed only as a wire-wrap prototype) through to production.
>
>I was a member of that team and I have fond memories of sitting in a
>basement office in Pittsburgh surrounded by kernel listings (with a very
>puzzled look on my face).
>
>Just a small footnote in Unix history...
>
>--
>Roger
That's strange, I have those very same memories. In fact I was looking
for someone who would appreciate this:
#ifdef PYTHON
Cheers,
Eric
Hello from Gregg C Levine
I've got a bundle of questions regarding E11, and its range of I/O
devices. Here goes:
1) Is anyone running the DOS/Windows version with the Display Register
device attached to a LPT port? Where did they obtain the LED devices
for it?
2) How did they configure its interpretation of the PDP-11 serial
devices?
3) Or the network connections? Favorite Ethernet cards as well.
And last but not least:
4)Which printer arrangement was used? Serial? Even a parallel
solution?
To be honest I haven't seen any action on both lists with in the past
number of days, so I thought I'd post something new to the PUPS list,
and give it something to chew on.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi
Hi,
I just thought of a neat idea. Put old versions of BSD source code into a CVS
archive using "cvs import" and then run a CVSWEB site with that.
Possibly converting SCCS to RCS to CVS. I don't know how far back my BSD SCCS
goes.
Maybe a smaller project to CVS 4.3BSD-tahoe to Quasijarus first.
One of the big problems is that they move files all over the place as BSD
developed and CVS doen't work too elegantly with those kind of changes.
Maybe subversion not CVS but I've yet to do anything with subversion.
Does anything like this already exist?
Thanks,
Ken
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
Kenneth Stailey <kstailey(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> One of the big problems is that they move files all over the place as BSD
> developed and CVS doen't work too elegantly with those kind of changes.
Yes, neither SCCS nor RCS nor CVS tracks file moves, and for this single reason
an SCCS/RCS/CVS tree is not sufficient by itself to act as a complete BSD
history tree. See this page for an idea of what I had to go through:
http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/Quasijarus/sccs.html
MS
I'm seeking info about the SVR4-MP ps options
-z and -Z, as used for mandatory access control.
This is so that they can be implemented for Linux.
Alternately, are there more-common ways to handle
this security data or more-common usage of the
-z and -Z options?
I could use some example output.
All "trusted" high-security systems are of interest.