The topic of GBACA (Get Back At Corporate America), the video game for
the BLIT/5620, has come up on a Facebook group.
Does anyone happen to have any details about it, source code, author,
screen shots, ...?
Thanks,
Mary Ann
> V6, as distributed, had no networking at all. There are two V6 systems with
> networking in TUHS:
>
> https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SRI-NOSC <https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SRI-NOSC>
> https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6 <https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6>
>
> The first is an 'NCP' Unix (unless unless you have an ARPANet); the second is
> a fairly early TCP/IP from BBN (ditto, out of the box; although one could write
> an Ethernet driver for it).
I’ve also done a port of the BBN VAX stack to V6 (running on a TI990 clone), using a serial
PPP interface to connect. Experimental, but may have the OP's interest:
https://www.jslite.net/cgi-bin/9995/dir?ci=tip
> There's also a fairly nice Internet-capable V6 (well, PWB1, actually) from MIT
> which I keep meaning to upload; it includes SMTP, FTP, etc, etc. I also have
> visions of porting an ARP I wrote to it, and bringing up an Ethernet driver
> for the DEQNA/DELQA, but I've yet to get to any of that.
I’d love to have a look at that and compare and contrast the approaches.
I’m finding that BBN’s original design, with a separate kernel thread for the network stack,
is elegant but difficult to tune: too much priority and it crowds out user processes, too little
and the slow PPP line is not kept busy.
I think I’m beginning to understand why CSRG (and later also BBN) moved to
the interrupt driven structure of 4.2BSD: perhaps it was also difficult to tune for a
VAX with ethernet.
> From: Paul Riley
> In the bootable images archive, there's the "Unknown V6" RL02
> image. I've tried that on SimH configured as an 11/23+ with 256kB of RAM
> and it seems to work fine.
Sorry, where's this archive? Somewhere in:
https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Distributions/Research/
I assume? From the description, that might be from the 'Shoppa disks'; didn't
realize that was a /23 on those.
> I would assume that Ethernet boards are available, but not supported on
> V6.
V6, as distributed, had no networking at all. There are two V6 systems with
networking in TUHS:
https://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SRI-NOSChttps://minnie.tuhs.org//cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=BBN-V6
The first is an 'NCP' Unix (unless unless you have an ARPANet); the second is
a fairly early TCP/IP from BBN (ditto, out of the box; although one could write
an Ethernet driver for it).
There's also a fairly nice Internet-capable V6 (well, PWB1, actually) from MIT
which I keep meaning to upload; it includes SMTP, FTP, etc, etc. I also have
visions of porting an ARP I wrote to it, and bringing up an Ethernet driver
for the DEQNA/DELQA, but I've yet to get to any of that.
> it's hard to glean that wisdom from reading the manual.
Yeah, DEC manuals went through a phase-change around about the time of the
/23. Old DEC manuals are wonderful; stuffed to the gills with deep technical
details. Suitable for engineers...
Later, they turned into manuals for 'ordinary people' - 'plug cable C1 into
plug P1'. Semi-useless; although one can often glean a few useful morsels if
you trawl through the entire thing.
That's why I've been doing PDP-11 pages on the CHWiki which attempt to cover a
lot of technical detail, in a high technical content/size way.
If you need something that's not there, let me know, and I'll get to adding it.
Noel
I've done some research for a friend about when the reboot() system call
was added, and how it related to the sync, sync, sync dance.
https://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/07/when-unix-learned-to-reboot2.html
may be of interest. Please do let me know if I've gotten something wrong...
Warner
> From: Jim Geist
> When did mmap(2) come about?
Pretty sure it's a Berserkleyism. I think it came in with the VM stuff that
DARPA mandated for VAX Unix (for the research project they funded).
Noel
One of the things that I've noticed in my explorations into the H.J. Lu
bootable root disks is that some of them predate the /sbin split in Linux.
One of them has exactly one file in /sbin and other commands spread
across /bin, /usr/bin, and /etc. The single file in /sbin is sln.
To me, this makes it fairly self evident that /sbin was originally for
statically linked binaries. At least in Linux.
Does anyone have any history of /sbin from other traditional Unixes?
I'd be quite interested in learning more.
I also noticed that (at least) one of the early versions of the H.J. Lu
disks had root's home directory in /usr/root.
I seem to recall that one version used an atypical of /users vs /usr.
Which as I understand it, goes back to the original / vs /usr split in
Unix, before /home became a thing.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
All,
So... I've moved on from v7 to 2.11bsd - shucks, vi and tar and co. just
work there and everything else seems to be similar enough for what I'm
interested in anyway. So yay, I won't be pestering y'all about vi
anymore :). One the other hand, now I'm interested in printing the docs.
2.11bsd comes with docs in, of all places, /usr/doc. In there are
makefiles for making the docs - ok, make nroff will make ascii docs, and
troff will make troff? docs using Ossana's 'original' troff. So, after
adding -t to it so it didn't complain about 'typesetter busy', I got no
errors. I mounted a tape, tar'ed my .out file and untar'ed it on my
macbook (did it for the nroff and troff output). Then I hit the first
snag, groff -Tps -ms troff.out > whatever.ps resulted in cannot adjust
line and cannot break line errors and groff -Tps -ms nroff.out >
whatever.ps resulted in a bunch of double vision. I seem to recall doing
this in v6 and it working ok (at least for nroff).
My questions:
1. Is there a troff to postcript conversion utility present in a stock
2.11 system (or even patch level 4xx system)?
2. Is there a way to build postscript directly on the system?
3. Is there an alternative modern way to get to ps or pdf output from
the nroff/troff that 2.11 has?
I'm still digging into the nroff stuff as that may be just minor diffs
between ancient nroff macros and "modern" macros or even just errors
(.sp -2 rather than .sp or .sp -1, .in -2 instead of .in +2), etc.
Although, the files display ok in 2.11bsd using nroff -ms nroff.out...
Thanks,
Will
--
GPG Fingerprint: 68F4 B3BD 1730 555A 4462 7D45 3EAA 5B6D A982 BAAF
> From: Paul Riley
> Is LSX the only option on the 11/03, or could I run V6 or Mini-Unix with
> more RAM?
All PDP-11 Unix versions from V4 on require the MMU, so the -11/03 is out for
them. We don't have the code for V2-V4, though. So V1 (mostly all assembler,
no C :-), LSW and Mini-Unix are the only options for it.
V6 can be run on an -11/23 (I've done it), but not straight out of the box;
it requires a few minor tweaks first:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/Running_UNIX_V6_on_an_-11/23
Noel
As the new year is about to kick in (down-under anyway), it got me to
thinking (always dangerous): how many here will be around for it to pick
up the pieces that are no doubt still lying around?
I'll be about the ripe old age of 85, so I may be around to see the
Imminent Death of the Internet (Film at 11).
2100? Forget it... Too bad, as "Revolt in 2100 (?)" is one of my
favourite Heinlein books.
Others?
-- Dave
We all know and love the UNIX beard, but I can't find anything on how the
beards started other than an old photo of Ken and Dennis with majestic
manes.
And, to make the question a bit more meta, what's the history of the joke
of the "UNIX beard"?
Tyler