> without those two we'd all be running M$ Windoze
Apropos of which, I complained to Walter Isaacson about his
writing them out of "The Innovators"--Turing Award, National
Medal of Technology, Japan Prize and all. I suppose I should
not be surprised that he didn't deign to answer.
Doug
[Cross-posted from the 3B2 mailing list]
Hi folks,
I'm in search of source code for AT&T's System V Release 3.2.1, 3.2.2,
and/or 3.2.3 for the 3B2. Does this exist? Has anyone ever seen it?
Note that I'm not looking for the System V Release 3.2 Source Code
Provision for the 3B2 /310 and /400 -- I already have that. It was
absolutely invaluable when I was writing my 3B2/400 emulator.
The reason I'm so keen on getting access is that I have ROM images from
a 3B2/1000, and I'd like to add support for it to my 3B2 emulator. The
system board memory map seems a bit different than the /300, /310, and
/400. These max out at SVR 3.2.
I can't imagine trying to add 3B2/1000 support without the 3.2.x source
code.
I imagine there's some tape image somewhere that's a delta of files that
take you from 3.2 to 3.2.1, 3.2.2 or 3.2.3?
-Seth
--
Seth Morabito
Poulsbo, WA, USA
web(a)loomcom.com
On 1/16/19, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling(a)kev009.com> wrote:
> I’ve heard and personally seen a lot of technical arrogance and
> incompetence out of the Masshole area. Was DEC inflicted? In
> “Showstopper” Cutler fled to the west coast to get away from this kind of
> thing.
>
Having worked at DEC from February 1980 until after the Compaq
takeover, I would say that DEC may have exhibited technical arrogance
from time to time, but certainly never technical incompetence. DEC's
downfall was a total lack of skill at marketing. Ken Olsen believed
firmly in a "build it and they will come" philosophy. Contrast this
with AT&T's brilliant "Unix - consider it a standard" ad campaign.
DEC also suffered from organizational paralysis. KO believed in
decisions by consensus. This is fine if you can reach a consensus,
but if you can't it leads to perpetually revisiting decisions and to
obstructionist behavior. There was a saying in DEC engineering that
any decision worth making was worth making 10 times. As opposed to
the "lead, follow, or get out of the way" philosophy at Sun. Or
Intel's concept of disagree and commit. DEC did move towards a
"designated responsible individual" approach where a single person got
to make the ultimate decision, but the old consensus approach never
really died.
Dave Cutler was the epitome of arrogance. On the technical side, he
got away with it because his way (which he considered to be the only
way) was usually at least good enough for Version 1, if not the best
design. Cutler excelled in getting V1 of something out the door. He
never stayed around for V2 of anything. He had a tendency to leave
messes behind him. A Cutler product reminded me of the intro to "The
Peabodys" segment of Rocky & Bullwinkle. A big elaborate procession,
followed by someone cleaning up the mess with a broom.
Cutler believed in a "my way or the highway" approach to software
design. His move to the west coast was to place himself far enough
away that those who wanted to revisit all his decisions would have a
tough time doing so.
On the personal side, he went out of his way to be nasty to people, as
pointed out elsewhere in this thread. Although he was admired
technically, nobody liked him.
-Paul W.
Meant to reply all on this....
Warner
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Warner Losh <imp(a)bsdimp.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Posters
To: Grant Taylor <gtaylor(a)tnetconsulting.net>
I'll take pictures tomorrow. No zeppelin though...
I had hoped that I still had my ultrix version of Phil Figlio's original
usenix artwork. I can find the Usenix one and the Unix one, but not that
one online. Anybody have one they can share?
Warner
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 7:32 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS <tuhs(a)minnie.tuhs.org
wrote:
> On 2/2/19 6:35 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Is there any interest from this group in photos of any of these?
>
> I would be interested in pictures of the computer related pictures to
> see if I'd be interested enough to pay for and / or for shipping on any
> of them.
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>
>
Noel Chiappa:
{And apologies for the non-Unix content, but at least it's about computers,
unlike all the postings about Jimmy Page's guitar; typical of the really poor
S/N on this list.)
======
Didn't Jimmy Page's guitar use an LSI-11 running Lycklama's Mini-UNIX?
And what was his page size?
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
I found 3 tubes of posters I'd been hoarding since college (well, since my
first job after college).
There's the usual 18-year-old-boy stuff (Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, etc),
but mixed in are a bunch of OSI/ISO network stack posters (thank goodness
that didn't become standard, woof!), a couple movie posters, an 10th
Anniversary poster for RT-11.
The ones that will interest this group, maybe, are the Unix Feuds poster
with the wizard among the waring armies, A 20th Anniversary of Unix poster
by Tenon Intersystems which has a nice picture of Unix through 1990 or so
(with Tenon's Mach^ten 1.0 for Macintosh derived from BSD 4.3 and Mach) on
it. It's in decent share, but not in collector ready shape.
Oh, and I have a Eunice poster that mixes the best of VMS and BSD 4.1 into
a seamless environment.
Is there any interest from this group in photos of any of these?
Warner
> I have tried to OCR program listings before, with rather
> poor results.
I OCR'd a sizable manuscript written on a pretty shabby portable typewriter.
I scanned each page twice, making sure to move the paper between scans.
Then I ran both diff (by words, not lines) and spell to smoke out trouble.
The word list for a program listing is quite short and easy to generate.
(Print a list of all the apparent words and visually eliminate the nonsense.)
And a spell check is an easy pipeline of standard utilities.
doug