I've assembled some notes from old manuals and other sources
on the formats used for on-disk file systems through the
Seventh Edition:
http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/~norman/old-unix/old-fs.html
Additional notes, comments on style, and whatnot are welcome.
(It may be sensible to send anything in the last two categories
directly to me, rather than to the whole list.)
Hi,
What version, exactly, of 6th Edition source code is contained in the Lions' commentary booklets? I took a look at the version available for download at [http://v6.cuzuco.com/v6.pdf] but it does not seem to match the source code in the TUHS archives.
If the source code was in fact modified by Lions, are there any machine-readable versions available?
Regards,
Maciek.
At this instant, there is an accessible
link at
http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=2724348
though it has some popups. A very nice story
indeed. I talked to the author (Konstantin Kakaes)
for a couple of hours in March. He really did want
to know mostly about the kind of things the article
talks about, and though the PR guy had probably told
him that I wouldn't get into things like SCO, in fact
that wasn't what he was interested in.
Dennis
Good article in the June 10th issue of the Economist
that may be of interest to TUHS members (I would have
caught it sooner, but I'm a little behind in my
reading).
Unix's founding fathers
Jun 10th 2004
From The Economist print edition
Dennis Ritchie invented C and was one of the key members of the team
behind Unix - two developments that underpin much modern software
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=S%27%2980%2EQQ7%27%23%40…
Subscription or "pay-per-view" required. I'd share the
full article, but I am afraid of their lawyers.
---corey
Shoppa wondered,
Can anyone comment about the history of the "sno" Snobol
interpreter that seems to exist in V4 (man page in the
archives gives 2/7/93 as the date) and some later
Unix versions (Sys V, V6, etc.)? In the TUHS archives
we have the V6 sources but they are remarkably comment-
free.
Was "sno" ever part of the build chain of any interesting
utilities etc?
Not that I know of; I think writing it was just a quick entertainment
for Ken. The "application" that has survived is a
1-page program that solves the Soma (or Instant Insanity)
puzzle.
Dennis
Can anyone comment about the history of the "sno" Snobol
interpreter that seems to exist in V4 (man page in the
archives gives 2/7/93 as the date) and some later
Unix versions (Sys V, V6, etc.)? In the TUHS archives
we have the V6 sources but they are remarkably comment-
free.
Was "sno" ever part of the build chain of any interesting
utilities etc?
I'm just generally curious about awk predecessors, if
anyone wants to chime in with their favorite pre-awk
string processing tools.
Tim.
Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again???
Just wondering...
Jason
Folks,
I am interested in the use of multiple system call sets in Unix systems.
I recollect that Pyramid Technology machines in the 80's allowed users
and/or processes to select whether to use BSD or SYSV system call
semantics. Also, FreeBSD supports Linux system calls and SYSV in
emulation.
Does anyone know a good location (book, article, website) that discusses
this.
thanks
dayton
Dayton Clark
CIS Department dayton(a)brooklyn.cuny.edu
Brooklyn College/CUNY 718.951.4811
Brooklyn, New York 11210 718.951.4842 (fax)