I've assembled some notes from old manuals and other sources
on the formats used for on-disk file systems through the
Seventh Edition:
http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/~norman/old-unix/old-fs.html
Additional notes, comments on style, and whatnot are welcome.
(It may be sensible to send anything in the last two categories
directly to me, rather than to the whole list.)
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7035&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
some quotes:
<< LJ: Is it true that you suggested the name "UNIX" for the long ago OS,
Multics? What does that word mean?
BK: Yes, long ago. Multics was an acronym for something like Multiplexed
Information and Computing Service, and it was big and complicated because it
had many of everything. I suggested Unics for Ken's new system, because it was
small and had at most one of anything. (Multi and uni are both Latin roots, so
it was a very weak pun.) Someone else spelled it with the letter X; no one can
remember who. >>
<< LJ: What UNIX OSes do you like? Linux? BSD?
BK: The way I use them, which is as a casual programmer, it doesn't
matter--they are all the same. If I encounter some difference, it only makes me
mad, because there really isn't any reason for things to be different most of
the time. I use Solaris at Princeton, Irix when I visit Bell Labs, and FreeBSD
on my Mac; I also have Cygwin on several PCs so that standard tools are readily
available. >>
But Brian, FreeBSD does not run on a Mac unless you don't need features like
booting up all the way.
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ppc.html
<< 3 July, 2002 : This page has been significantly updated. FreeBSD/PowerPC
currently boots almost to the point of reaching single-user mode. >>
Oh well.
Kenneth Stailey:
But Brian, FreeBSD does not run on a Mac unless you don't need features like
booting up all the way.
=======
I think that just underscores the point: it doesn't matter which
church the system goes to as long as it works.
If everyone was as areligious in their computing the world would
be a much better place.
Norman Wilson
Toronto ON
I used to have an old Lotus 123 1A manual, it was for the 3270PC. It
mentioned how there was some windowed system and a way to escape to
DOS 2.0 and how 123 had to be run in full-screen mode because it
raw-blitted to the video RAM. Sounded like the system was rather
Windows 2-like, or at the very least Windows 1-like, back before the
Mac. *blink* I don't know, never seen a 3270PC in real life.
I do think that this CP/88 might be that windowed system.
...I wonder if it could run on Bochs or some other x86 PC emulator *g*
-uso.
kirei-na pinku-na E-MAIL-saito
___________________________________________________________
Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com
Hi all,
I see I've built up a long list of e-mails from people who have
stuff to donate to the Unix Archive. There is now an FTP upload area on
the machine: ftp to minnie.tuhs.org, cd to incoming.
If you do upload anything called XXX, please also include a README.XXX file
so I know what it is, where it came from and other useful information.
If you have material that cannot be publicly released at present, but
would like it archived for safety reasons, simply use random file names,
and tell me the correct names in the README file. I will squirrel these
things away for later.
The area is set to allow uploads and to see the directory contents. No
downloads are possible.
Thanks all!
Warren
I've just come across mention of an I80x86 product of IBM's, called CP/88 and
CP/X86
http://www.stanford.edu/group/mmdd/SiliconValley/Ferguson/Chapter.5.html
Anybody know anything more about it, and is it still extant, in existence?
Wesley Parish
--
Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?"
You ask, "What is the most important thing?"
Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata."
I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."
Hi All,
For those of you who don't follow alt.sys.pdp11: I set up
a simple web page to start an inventory poll on the number
and types of PDP-11 systems used by hobbyists, the operating
systems in use on them, and what, if any, licenses are being
used for those systems.
All this has to do with the whole Mentec not having a license
program for the PDP-11 R* operaing systems (RT, RSX and RSTS).
After some discussion with Mentec, the site was set up to do
the gathering of numbers so we can convince their Management
that there are many systems in hobby use, and that there's
enough people willing to aquire such a license.
Please check out
http://www.pdp11.nl/poll.htm
and do your magic. None of the information provided will be
transferred to anyone- only the summarized info will be made
available in a report to Mentec - a copy of which you can
request by requesting the 'feedbeck' stuff in the poll.
Thanks, and spread the word !
Fred
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Here's a question. Does anyone on this list, know where I could obtain
an LSI-11? Or even a Heathkit, H-11?
And the other question, is: Has anyone gotten the different versions
of E-11 to boot the operating systems that are available on the file
server? These are versions that are stored on the file server itself.
Older then 3.1 is what I am thinking of.
For my first question, please reply directly to me. That is, only
positive ones.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon(a)worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )