Hi, I'm interested in buying old hardware like PDP-11, VAX,
Sun, etc., if possible near Italy (or in E.U.). Can someone
subscribed to this list suggest me [someone|a company|a university] that
sells this type of hardware, please?
Regards,
Sandro
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA15858
for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:00:59 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au> Fri Oct 10 09:00:59 1997
Received: from henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (henry.cs.adfa.oz.au [131.236.21.158])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA15853
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:00:55 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from wkt@localhost) by henry.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA02541 for pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:00:59 +1000 (EST)
From: Warren Toomey <wkt(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199710092300.JAA02541(a)henry.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: PDP-11 Xenix
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (PDP Unix Preservation)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:00:59 +1000 (EST)
Reply-To: wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
I just received this email from Frank Wortner. Anybody have a copy of PDP-11
Xenix?
Warren
----- Forwarded message from Frank Wortner -----
From: "Frank Wortner" <fwortner(a)prodigy.net>
To: <wkt(a)cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Request to Join PUPS
I've sent off email to a friend of mine who preserved some materials from a
now-defunct software company we used to work for. He *might* have that
tape. I regret not keeping track of it, but fifteen years have elapsed
since I last booted it.
Too bad. PDP-11 Xenix had a number of nice features.
o It was based on the Seventh Edition.
o It ran on everything from a PDP-11/23 on up.
o It could simulate split instruction and data space on non I&D machines.
(*)
o It had a complete shutdown procedure (an elaborate /etc/shutdown script)
o The kernel was delivered as an archive library (".a" file), so you could
reconfigure without source.
Perhaps someone at SCO (or Microsoft) may still have a tape of it. Most
software firms archive their products in secure vaults, so it might still
exist in some warehouse.
(*) The scheme involved paging the instructions while the data remained
resident. The first 8K of the program was always resident and contained a
jump table and supporting software. The next 8K held whatever instructions
were executing at the time, while the remaining 48K was reserved for the
data and stack segments. Building a simulated I&D executable required the
user to link once as a pure executable, once as a split executable, and
finally running both executables through a program which built the final
simulated split I&D executable. The compiler had an option ('-j' if I
recall correctly) that performed these three links automatically.
Sorry for the rambling note, but I'm just a bit overwhelmed by nostalgia.
;-)
Frank
----- End of forwarded message from Frank Wortner -----
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA16074
for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:58:50 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "Frank Wortner" <fwortner(a)prodigy.net> Fri Oct 10 10:58:40 1997
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA16069
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:58:45 +1000 (EST)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0)
id UAA27221; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:58:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
id AA13113; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:58:40 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:58:40 -0400
From: allisonp(a)world.std.com (Allison J Parent)
Message-Id: <199710100058.AA13113(a)world.std.com>
To: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
<I just received this email from Frank Wortner. Anybody have a copy of PDP-1
<Xenix?
<
< Warren
Well yes, sorta. It's on the net, John Wilson has it on ftp.dbit.com. The
however is it's for the PRO350/380 systems. I don't know if it can be moved
to more standard PDP-11 configurations.
Allison
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA16364
for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 13:20:26 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "David C. Jenner" <djenner(a)halcyon.com> Fri Oct 10 13:20:01 1997
Received: from mgate.nwnexus.com (mgate.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.100])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA16359
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 13:20:19 +1000 (EST)
Received: from halcyon.com (blv-lx103-ip6.nwnexus.net [206.63.41.56])
by mgate.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA14086;
Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:19:57 -0700
Message-ID: <343D9EE1.1E1F32E4(a)halcyon.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 20:20:01 -0700
From: "David C. Jenner" <djenner(a)halcyon.com>
Reply-To: djenner(a)halcyon.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
CC: pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix
References: <199710100058.AA13113(a)world.std.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9AECC2A19114B8324D6E2D6A"
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------9AECC2A19114B8324D6E2D6A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I don't think John has it at ftp.dbit.com. And I doubt that XENIX is
anywhere on the net. I don't even know if there was a PDP-11 XENIX. (It
was originally MS, afterall. They "sold" it to SCO way back, before SCO
collected everything else.)
There is, however, VENIX (no commercial relation to XENIX other than a
common parent) on ftp.update.uu.se. This version of XENIX is for the
DEC Pro350/380, which is, essentially, a PDP-11. There was also a VENIX
for "real" PDP-11s.
Dave
Allison J Parent wrote:
>
> <I just received this email from Frank Wortner. Anybody have a copy of PDP-1
> <Xenix?
> <
> < Warren
>
> Well yes, sorta. It's on the net, John Wilson has it on ftp.dbit.com. The
> however is it's for the PRO350/380 systems. I don't know if it can be moved
> to more standard PDP-11 configurations.
>
> Allison
--------------9AECC2A19114B8324D6E2D6A
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for David C. Jenner
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"
begin: vcard
fn: David C. Jenner
n: Jenner;David C.
adr: 3153 N.E. 84th Street;;;Seattle;WA;98115-4717;USA
email;internet: djenner(a)halcyon.com
tel;fax: 206-527-2019
tel;home: 206-527-2018
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version: 2.1
end: vcard
--------------9AECC2A19114B8324D6E2D6A--
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16464
for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:12:58 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
Dave,
<I don't think John has it at ftp.dbit.com. And I doubt that XENIX is
<anywhere on the net. I don't even know if there was a PDP-11 XENIX. (It
<was originally MS, afterall. They "sold" it to SCO way back, before SCO
<collected everything else.)
Your right, drain beth, err brain death. Sometimes all those *nixs are the
same to me. Especially after configuring three vaxen for VMS and installing
it. I know heresy but, Netbsd has proven uninstallable here on all four
systems.
<DEC Pro350/380, which is, essentially, a PDP-11. There was also a VENIX
<for "real" PDP-11s.
Well venix on the pro350 runs far better than POS! In fact it's the only
*nix running here as even slackware has had problems (bad CD!).
That however is news! Is there a version of venix for "real" PDP-11s? on
the net?
Allison
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16515
for pups-liszt; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:46:48 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com> Fri Oct 10 14:46:33 1997
Received: from freebie.lemis.com (gregl1.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.133])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA16510
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:46:43 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from grog@localhost)
by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id OAA22633;
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:16:33 +0930 (CST)
Message-ID: <19971010141633.30732(a)lemis.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:16:33 +0930
From: Greg Lehey <grog(a)lemis.com>
To: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
Cc: djenner(a)halcyon.com, pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix
References: <199710100412.AA13660(a)world.std.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <199710100412.AA13660(a)world.std.com>; from Allison J Parent on Fri, Oct 10, 1997 at 12:12:45AM -0400
Organisation: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia
Phone: +61-8-8388-8250
Fax: +61-8-8388-8250
Mobile: +61-41-739-7062
WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog
Fight-Spam-Now: http://www.cauce.org
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
On Fri, Oct 10, 1997 at 12:12:45AM -0400, Allison J Parent wrote:
> Dave,
>
> <I don't think John has it at ftp.dbit.com. And I doubt that XENIX is
> <anywhere on the net. I don't even know if there was a PDP-11 XENIX. (It
> <was originally MS, afterall. They "sold" it to SCO way back, before SCO
> <collected everything else.)
I thought SCO developed XENIX right from the word go, only in those
days they belonged to Microsoft.
> Your right, drain beth, err brain death. Sometimes all those *nixs are the
> same to me. Especially after configuring three vaxen for VMS and installing
> it. I know heresy but, Netbsd has proven uninstallable here on all four
> systems.
Interesting. What was the problem?
Greg
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA17679
for pups-liszt; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 01:02:58 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "Frank Wortner" <fwortner(a)prodigy.net> Sat Oct 11 00:57:18 1997
Received: from mail1w-int.prodigy.net (pimout1-ext.prodigy.net [198.83.18.53])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA17674
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 01:02:51 +1000 (EST)
Received: from seeker.prodigy.com (seeker.prodigy.com [199.4.137.72])
by pimout1-int.prodigy.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA81722
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:57:23 -0400
From: "Frank Wortner" <fwortner(a)prodigy.net>
To: "PDP-11 Unix Preservation Society" <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix (LONG)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:57:18 -0400
Message-ID: <01bcd58c$ce268560$488904c7(a)seeker.prodigy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Since I'm the one that started this --- albeit indirectly --- let me try to
explain.
Way back when --- about 1981 or 82 --- I worked for a small (now defunct)
software company. We owned 2 PDP-11/23s. Initially, we ran a distribution
of the Sixth Edition on them. That came from a company in New York ---
that's where I am geographically, BTW --- called Yourdon. The system was
called UV6.
After a while, we decided to upgrade to V7. At the time, we had begun a
relationship with another (now defunct) firm called Lifeboat Associates
(also in New York, later in Tarrytown, NY). They distributed microcomputer
software, principally CP/M-based. They were a Microsoft distributor.
Microsoft had just started Unix development at the time. Lifeboat sold us a
V7 system: Microsoft PDP-11 Xenix. I know it was Microsoft because the
tape lables said so, and I remember that the line printer printed release
notes contained a banner page that indicated that they came from Microsoft's
DEC 20(!) (cheerfully named "Microsoft Heating Plant").
PD.-11 Xenix was essentially V7, but it had a few added features.
Processor support included all models of PDP-11 with MMUs: 23s, 34s, 40s,
45s, 55s, 60s, and 70s. It had split I&D space emulation --- borrowed, I
believe from 2.something BSD. That emulation required a grand total of
three(!) link passes, but the compiler driver was modified to do this
automatically if you specified the "-j" option. Instead of source, the
kernel was delivered mostly as .o files and .a libraries, so you could
reconfigure the OS without source. The reconfigure programs just spat out
some assembly language and C "glue" that you compiled and linked with the .o
and .a files. In fact, this was pretty much automated. The system also
had a rather extensive /etc./shutdown shell script which calmly and
thoroughly brought the system to a quiescent state and could optionally
reboot or halt it. Although the OS was pretty big --- I find it amazing
that I thought of it as "big" ;-) --- you could, with some effort build a
boot floppy on a RX02 diskette. That could run exactly 1 (one) process ---
the RX02 system had *no* swap space. I remember system recovery sessions
in which I constantly had to boot the floppy, see the shell prompt, and
then "exec fsck" and watch as fsck finished its run, and init respawned the
shell!
Anyhow, I know I *used to have* the release notes and I *might* have had
the tape, but both, sadly, are probably lost. I was wondering if anyone
else might have seen or, even better, still has a tape of this rare
version of V7. Perhaps there's an archive at Microsoft or SCO that harbors
a tape. Most software firms do have some sort of policy about placing
products in escrow with a third party. Maybe this still exists. If not,
that's OK. If SCO is kind enough to allow source licensing to individuals
for noncommercial use, then this largely becomes a moot issue.
Full source V7 (or even better 2BSD) is probably a more "interesting" system
from a hobbyist or preservationist point of view, particularly if you're
like me and don't have or care to own actual PDP-11 hardware. I'm quite
happy to run John Wilson's and Bob Supnick's wonderful emulator programs
with whatever software I can obtain. They let me have the PDP-11 models I
worked on (23, 34, 45) as well as those I'd like to have had (70) without
the hassle and expense of maintaining the actual hardware.
BTW, if John or Bob reads this list, l'd like to say "Thank you" to both
of them. Also thanks to Warren for his work preserving the old Unix
software. It's a great deal of fun to see old "friends" again, and I think
it will be just as much fun to see software and "hardware" combinations that
I didn't have access to in the "good old days." Thanks also to SCO for
binary licenses for these "historic" systems; I hope that they will be able
to license source code in the near future.
Sorry for the long ramble and thanks for reading!
Frank
Received: (from major@localhost)
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA17931
for pups-liszt; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 03:15:43 +1000 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au: major set sender to owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au using -f
>From "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com> Sat Oct 11 02:55:45 1997
Received: from moe.2bsd.com (0(a)MOE.2BSD.COM [206.139.202.200])
by minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA17926
for <pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au>; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 03:15:37 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from sms@localhost)
by moe.2bsd.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA20665;
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Steven M. Schultz" <sms(a)moe.2bsd.com>
Message-Id: <199710101655.JAA20665(a)moe.2bsd.com>
To: fwortner(a)prodigy.net, pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Subject: Re: PDP-11 Xenix (LONG)
Sender: owner-pups(a)minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Howdy -
> From: "Frank Wortner" <fwortner(a)prodigy.net>
> Since I'm the one that started this --- albeit indirectly --- let me try to
And I hate to see a fellow talk to himself without interruption ;-)
> PD.-11 Xenix was essentially V7, but it had a few added features.
> Processor support included all models of PDP-11 with MMUs: 23s, 34s, 40s,
I remember (not terribly fondly) running V7 on an 11/23. We hacked
in an overlay scheme to the kernel (but not user programs). Just
enough resources to run 1 user and a couple processes - do an "ls" and
the shell got swapped out, when 'ls' finished the shell would get
swapped back in. Wheee! ;)
> 45s, 55s, 60s, and 70s. It had split I&D space emulation --- borrowed, I
> believe from 2.something BSD. That emulation required a grand total of
Not having used Xenix I'd never heard the term "split I&D space
emulation". What we hacked in to V7 and BSD later implemented
was an even older concept: overlays.
2.9 was the first version I know of that had 'overlay' support. The
overlays were memory resident and switching between them was done
by flipping MMU registers.
It is (present tense since 2.11BSD uses the same method today) done
with a single link phase (no "-j" option or multiple link edits). In
2.9 there was a limit of 7 overlay segments plus the base segment. Later
on (the 1985 update to 2.9) the limit was increased to 15 overlays
which has proven to be adequate since then. For the kernel the overlays
could only be 8kb (1 page register) but user mode programs could have
larger (but still multiple of 8kb) overlays.
In 2.9 there was a separate libc.a that you did need to link with
because the callframe had an extra word (the overlay number) and
'csv, cret' had a couple extra instructions to switch overlays. Later
(2.10 and up) the callframe was changed to always have the extra word
This made life easier (at the expense of an extra 3microseconds per
function call) by not having to maintain/build two versions of all
the libraries.
> three(!) link passes, but the compiler driver was modified to do this
> automatically if you specified the "-j" option. Instead of source, the
> kernel was delivered mostly as .o files and .a libraries, so you could
A multiphase link IS currently used to build the 2.11 networking though.
The networking code (4.3BSD's TCP/IP stack) runs in supervisor mode.
The kernel, at boot time, loads /netnix into supervisor space. The
/netnix image is built in a similar manner to what was mentioned for
Xenix's emulated I&D space - first build the unix image (with undefined
references to the networking code), then build the netnix image
(with undefined references to the kernel code), then cross reference
the two images for undefineds and create .s stub files to satisfy
the undefineds. Assemble the two .s files and then link unix with
d.netnix.o and netnix with d.unix.o and voila a kernel and an image
it can load into supervisor space.
> reboot or halt it. Although the OS was pretty big --- I find it amazing
> that I thought of it as "big" ;-) --- you could, with some effort build a
Even V7 had trouble fitting on a non split I/D machine. The problem
is that the kernel has to map the I/O page which removes an extra
MMU page from being used for data. Then the 'u' area needs a page
(for the kernel stack and per process context). And you need a page
to perform copyin/copyout with (and to map the buffer cache if that
has been moved external to the kernel) - that leaves only 40kb for
everything else (and on a nonsplit I/D machine with overlays you'd
need two or three pages for the base segment and an overlay, that leaves
just 2 pages or 16kb for all the data).
> Full source V7 (or even better 2BSD) is probably a more "interesting" system
> from a hobbyist or preservationist point of view, particularly if you're
> like me and don't have or care to own actual PDP-11 hardware. I'm quite
An 11/73 takes up less space than some PC tower cases and uses about
the same amount of electricity.
> happy to run John Wilson's and Bob Supnick's wonderful emulator programs
> with whatever software I can obtain. They let me have the PDP-11 models I
I can't speak for John's emulator (only runs on top of DOS and my
place is a MS-free zone ;)) but I have booted up 2.11BSD under Bob's.
Only went to the single user state and ran a couple simple commands.
Seems to work ok that far, but 'vi' doesn't run right - I suspect it's
something to do with overlaid programs flipping MMU registers about
but haven't had the time to look into it further (besides which I've
a 11/73 and a 11/93 to use).
> worked on (23, 34, 45) as well as those I'd like to have had (70) without
> the hassle and expense of maintaining the actual hardware.
A Q-bus system such as an 11/83 combines the best of both worlds - it's
got the address space and the speed (cpuwise) of a 70 but the
convenience of no UNIBUS map (like the 45). Maintenance thus far
over the last 6 years has consisted of replacing an M8192 when the
cache developed a parity error.
Well, I suppose I should get back to work before the boss wanders by
and sees me having fun instead of getting his work done ;-)
Steven Schultz
OK, Frank is likely correct. But I still don't think you'll find it
anywhere
on the 'net! It would be nice if it were in the PUP archives, though.
Getting
it there might be hard because MS might still have some rights to it.
I did some digging, and here are some relevant dates:
8/25/80 Microsoft announced DEC PDP-11 XENIX (along with versions for
several
other machines--Intel 8086, Zilog Z8000, and Motorola
M68000).
[This would have to be Version 7 based.]
10/01/80 Microsoft notes PDP-11 XENIX is "scheduled for release".
[It's not
clear if this means it was actually released on that date.]
12/08/81 Microsoft and SCO signed a letter of intent for SCO to be a
second-
source of XENIX. [No mention of PDP-11; just that XENIX was
being
upgraded to System III at that time.]
1/22/85 Microsoft and AT&T announce plans for compatible future
releases
of XENIX and UNIX [based on System V].
1/31/86 Microsoft and SCO announce new agreements for SCO to be prime
distrubutor
of XENIX System V to VAR and VAD channels.
2/15/89 Microsoft makes 20% minority investment in SCO. [I seem to
recall that
SCO got (all?) XENIX rights at this time.]
So it looks like there was a window of about a year when a Version 7
based XENIX
was probably available. Certainly starting in 1983 Microsoft announced
all sorts
of versions of XENIX for other hardware, including IBM System 9000 (yes,
there
really was a HAL 9000 (Motorola MC68000-based)--I had a couple), IBM
PC/AT, AT&T
UNIX PC and PC 6300, and Compaq machines.
Dave
Frank Wortner wrote:
>
> Since I'm the one that started this --- albeit indirectly --- let me try to
> explain.
>
> Way back when --- about 1981 or 82 --- I worked for a small (now defunct)
> software company. We owned 2 PDP-11/23s. Initially, we ran a distribution
> of the Sixth Edition on them. That came from a company in New York ---
> that's where I am geographically, BTW --- called Yourdon. The system was
> called UV6.
>
> After a while, we decided to upgrade to V7. At the time, we had begun a
> relationship with another (now defunct) firm called Lifeboat Associates
> (also in New York, later in Tarrytown, NY). They distributed microcomputer
> software, principally CP/M-based. They were a Microsoft distributor.
> Microsoft had just started Unix development at the time. Lifeboat sold us a
> V7 system: Microsoft PDP-11 Xenix. I know it was Microsoft because the
> tape lables said so, and I remember that the line printer printed release
> notes contained a banner page that indicated that they came from Microsoft's
> DEC 20(!) (cheerfully named "Microsoft Heating Plant").
>
> PD.-11 Xenix was essentially V7, but it had a few added features.
snip
> BTW, if John or Bob reads this list, l'd like to say "Thank you" to both
> of them. Also thanks to Warren for his work preserving the old Unix
> software. It's a great deal of fun to see old "friends" again, and I think
> it will be just as much fun to see software and "hardware" combinations that
> I didn't have access to in the "good old days." Thanks also to SCO for
> binary licenses for these "historic" systems; I hope that they will be able
> to license source code in the near future.
>
> Sorry for the long ramble and thanks for reading!
>
> Frank
