[COFF] Re: [TUHS] A few comments on porting the Bourne shell

And there is certainly no simple relationship between age and likeliness-to-still-work. A couple years ago now, I helped inventory the business space and warehouse of a man who had had a stroke and would thus not be able to continue running his direct mail business. But in 2017, he was running a direct-mail advertising business off an honest-to-god PDP-11/70 and a bunch of ADM-3A terminals. He also had several Vaxen out in his warehouse, a dozen or so TI Silent 700s, and even an 029 card punch. I think his basic philosophy was to buy these machines as they were surplussed and use them for parts, and apparently it worked fine for him until his health failed. I've got what looks to be a pretty pristine VAX-11/730 from the collection, which someday I will get a beefy enough 110V-220V transformer to run (sure, I have 220 to my dryer, but I'm not going to pay to have it run to my office), and an RM-80, which is now a nightstand. I would be very surprised if the VAX wouldn't work with no more than minor capacitor work. I also snagged a Sun 9-track tape drive which came from NOAO and is back home in the correct building, if not the correct office. It's a coffee table now, because I have no half-inch tapes I want to read. If someone does, well, it still powers up and spins the reels. Someone else can sacrifice the goats to get whichever flavor of SCSI it speaks talking to something modern. My annual Elvis' Birthday Party is coming up, which is really a boardgaming and retrogaming party, so I'm going through my stuff trying to figure out what I want to have in Display Mode as guests arrive. A lot of my mid-90s-through-mid-2000s stuff doesn't work anymore, like the original Xbox, and the G5 powermac that suffered from the capacitor plague. But my 80s consoles and 8-bit computers are mostly basically working fine. The blue electron gun on my Bondi Blue iMac has failed, which is sad, the better-built 90s workstations are OK, although the CMOS battery on the SparcStation 10 is long-dead, and the power supplies on pretty much all the Microvax 3000-series need rework (but the VAK4kVLC is running fine, so there is a real VAX to play with). But in general: both machines and magnetic storage prior to 1995 have a good chance of still working (for very occasional duty, anyway), and then there's a decade or so where it's probably dead, and then newer than that is OK again. These things are all extremely fun to play with, but honestly I only ever dust them off a couple times a year. For more-routine retrocomputing jobs (like porting Frotz to TOPS-20), well, emulation doesn't cost me nearly so much electricity, I don't have to deal with fan noise, and I'm not worried about some capacitor somewhere giving up its magic smoke, or just old solder joints finally cracking apart. Because of the magic of Moore's Law, I can run several 36-bit systems at once on a (back in the good old days, when you could actually get them) $50 Raspberry Pi. Note that MetroTrainsMelbourne ended up with PDP-11-on-a-board plugged into Windows XP systems, and some sort of ISA-bus-to-Unibus converter. I wonder what they're doing now? It's always the peripheral support that keeps you running on the original hardware, and from the description and the age of the system I bet the VDU serial links were pretty tightly coupled to the rest of the timetable generator, and I bet that's the hard part to reengineer with equivalent functionality. Me, I would have spent the second 5 years of the extension project paying someone to implement an equivalent (but not necessarily bug-compatible) scheduler and some sort of message-bus-over-TCP/IP-to-small-form-factor-PCs-hidden-behind-HDMI-TVs for the display units, in parallel with the existing system, with particular attention to decoupling production of the schedule data from delivering it to the remote users, so when that 10 years was up, I'd have had something I was confident in switching to that would be cheaply maintainable for a while, and where I could upgrade the display and compute tech individually. But I also suspect management didn't agree to spend their money that way. Adam