This has inspired me to re-read Melinda Varian's "What Mother Never Told
You About VM Service" and it's still a magnificent document. I once again
find the control files confusing as hell, but once you get used to how they
work, which once upon a time I was, you had a repeatable (and unwindable!)
service process.
I miss the casualness with which you'd build a new CP nucleus and test it
out on a second-level system. It's so much better than anything in the
Unix world, far more elegant than testing kernel patches in a Linux virtual
machine, largely because of the ease with which you can attach minidisks to
a first, second, or whatever-level system. I guess cgroups and bind mounts
finally get you most of the way there in terms of mounting arbitrary
storage to virtual systems, but it's still a pain in the ass to test
multiple kernels.
Not that I spend much time anymore that far down in the system (any
system!), but...VM got a lot of things right.
Adam
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:15 PM Dave Horsfall <dave(a)horsfall.org> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
wrote:
Program
Temporary Fix.
Yes. But I recall correctly. See the Wikipedia page:
Customers sometimes explain the acronym in a tongue-in-cheek manner as
permanent temporary fix or more practically probably this fixes,
because they have the option to make the PTF a permanent part of the
operating system if the patch fixes the problem.
Yeah, they did have a habit of being permanent, but I don't recall
them ever being called by any of those names during my servitude.
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
COFF mailing list
COFF(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff