Howdy folks, I wanted to get some thoughts and experiences with regards to what sort of
EOL handling of mainframe/mini hardware was typical. Part of this is to inform what and
where to look for old hardware things.
So the details may differ with era, but what I'm curious about is back in the day,
when a mainframe or mini was essentially decommissioned, what was more likely to be done
with the central unit, and peripherals if they weren't forward compatible with that
user's new system.
Were machines typically offloaded for money to smaller ops, or was it more common to
simply dispose of/recycle components? As a more pointed example, if you worked in a shop
that had IBM S/3x0, PDPs, larger 3B hardware, when those fell out of use, what was the
protocol for getting rid of it? Were most machines "disposed of" in a complete
way, or was it very typical to parts it out first, meaning most machines that reached EOL
simply don't exist anymore, they weren't moved as a unit, rather, they're
any number of independent parts floating around anywhere from individual collections to
slowly decaying in a landfill somewhere.
My fear is that the latter was more common, as that's what I've seen in my lab
days; old instrumentation wasn't just auctioned off or otherwise gotten rid of
complete, we'd typically parts the things out resulting in a chassis and some of the
paneling going in one waste stream, unsalvageable parts like burnt out boards going in
another, and anything reusable like ribbon cables and controller boards being stashed to
replace parts on their siblings in the lab. I dunno if this is apples to oranges though
because the main instruments I'm thinking of, the HP/Agilent 5890, 6890, and 7890
series, had different lifespan expectations than computing systems had, and share a lot
more of the under the hood components like solenoids and gas tubing systems, so that may
not be a good comparison, just the closest one I have from my own personal experience.
Thoughts?
- Matt G.