A RocketPort multi-serial sounds really, really likely for an astrophysics
data collection instrument. Thank you! Mystery probably solved!
The 8250 was unbuffered or maybe had a 1 byte buffer, the 16450 had a
1-byte buffer, the 16550 had a 16-byte buffer. I remember vividly how much
better my life got when I got 16550 serial ports for my '386.
Adam
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:12 AM Clem Cole <clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
Adam/Dave,
For whatever's it's worth, in PC/AT ISA bus times, at least one of the
serial port vendors (RocketPort was the vendor IIRC), used a DB-52P
connector, that connected to an interesting 'tail' which had 8 DB25P
connected to the DB25-S at the other end. This allowed 6 data conductors
(RCV/XMT/RTS/CTS/CD/DTR) * 8 ports, plus 6 grounds which again IIRC they
interspersed among the remaining 6 ground pins.
What I remember is that it was this specific board that was one of only a
handful serial boards[1] that could run UNIX properly and hang Trailblazer
modems off of it because they not only fully pinned, but they had
single-chip custom USART with a good bit of buffering and hardware-based
RTS/CTS flow control. I think I may still have one somewhere, as I saw the
cable for it when I was looking for something else over the Christmas
holidays.
[1] The original PC/AT used the NS8250 UART with no input buffering, which
went through a couple of generations, eventually begat the *550 version and
had I think an 8 character input buffer. But IIRC none of them had
hardware flow control. I forget the # now, Moto made a nice dual UART
with 16 chars of input buffering, that many of us on Unix workstation
business used, but when we moved to BSD 386 and Linux, we were stuck with
PC hardware, which had a particularly hard time with things like the
Trailblazer (which was the modem of choice for UUCP).
Clem
_______________________________________________
COFF mailing list
COFF(a)minnie.tuhs.org
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coff