Sorry, sent a picture along with this, but it got rejected because it
was too big ;)
> On 10/28/2019 3:10 PM, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>> I was bound to happen. List all the prompts!
>> "*" seems popular on PDP-10s.
>
> Que? The only PDP-10 prompt that matters is "."
>
> The other less-desired (by me) is @
>
> art k.
[Redirecting to COFF]
On 2019-Oct-20 00:02:56 +0530, Abhinav Rajagopalan <abhinavrajagopalan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>Forgive me for both hijacking this thread, and to address my amateurish
>gnawing concern, but how was it be possible to write differential/integral
>equations at an assembly/machine level at the time, especially in machines
>such as the PDP-7 and such which had IIRC just 16 instructions and operated
>on the basis of mere words, especially the floating point math being done.
My 1st edition Wilkes, Wheeler, Gill[1] documents that, by 1951, EDSAC[2]
had a floating-point library that supported addition, subtraction and
multiplication (no division) of numbers with 23-27 bits of precision and a
range of 1e-63 to 1e63. EDSAC was much less powerful than a PDP-7.
Writing a floating-point library is not that difficult, though getting
the rounding correct for all the edge cases is tricky. Actually using
floating-point and avoiding the pitfalls can be harder - see (eg)
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html (though
https://floating-point-gui.de/ may be more approachable).
[1] https://archive.org/details/programsforelect00wilk
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDSAC
--
Peter Jeremy
Here's something I think some people here just might be interested in.
Humble Bundle is offering (for another just over a week; until
2019-10-21 18:00 -11:00) a "Linux & UNIX" ebook bundle from O'Reilly,
consisting of:
(at USD 1.00 or more)
- Classic Shell Scripting, 1st Edition
- Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Edition
- Introducing Regular Expressions, 1st Edition
- grep Pocket Reference, 1st Edition
- Learning GNU Emacs, 3rd Edition
- Unix Power Tools, 3rd Edition
(at USD 8.00 or more, all the above _plus_)
- Learning the bash Shell, 3rd Edition
- Learning the vi and Vim Editors, 7th Edition
- Linux in a Nutshell, 6th Edition
- sed & awk, 2nd Edition
(at USD 15.00 or more, all the above _plus_)
- bash Cookbook, 2nd Edition
- Linux System Programming, 2nd Edition
- Mastering Regular Expressions, 3rd Edition
- Effective awk Programming, 4th Edition
- Linux Pocket Guide, 3rd Edition
All in .mobi, .pdf and .epub formats, free of DRM.
Some of the proceeds from this offering go to Code for America.
No affiliation; just a happy customer.
https://www.humblebundle.com/books/linux-unix-oreilly-books
--
Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael(a)kjorling.se
“The most dangerous thought that you can have as a creative person
is to think you know what you’re doing.” (Bret Victor)
At the risk of this drifting, it probably should move over to the COFF
mailing list, which I have CC'ed. I'll do this one last one here so
people not yet on COFF that want to follow up can see it.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:27 AM <arnold(a)skeeve.com> wrote:
> It was bizarre and ugly. The only thing that made it anywhere
> near usable were the Software Tools.
>
Amen... (more in a minute)
>
> There's a reason Prime died pretty quickly once Unix started to
> spread. The architecture also was strange; the characters used
> mark parity (8th bit always on).
>
Yeah, it was an interesting box. Fast and cost-effective for its time and
an excellent Fortran system which why they did as well as they did.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Arnold
>
You probably know this but you folks had a huge influence on the Pr1mates.
So much so when Bill P, Paul L, and Michael S. left Pr1me to create
Apollo, the used your version of the SWT as their first command system for
Aegis (*a.k.a.* DOMAIN OS). They did not quite get it that they needed a
real UNIX, so they roped tjt and myself from Masscomp went we all formed
Belmont (*a.k.a.* Stellar in a later renaming). But they did recognize it
was useful and people wanted to use that style of interface, not something
dreamed up specific to that machine.
I remember trying to explain to Bill the difference - he's a vision guy,
but primarily a hardware type, although one of the most amazing people I
have ever known. IMO: Leach never really understood the Unix ideas of
being simple (which is one of the reasons why Windows has that
forsaken registry sin from Aegis, he brought it with him from Apollo to
MSFT). I used to argue with him about it in the 1980s (he hated/thought
ASCII text files were terrible and he should control everything in some
framework or privileged API).
> From: Larry McVoy
> If it really was just about his views, his views have been consistent
> for a long time and MIT didn't care.
The outrage over Epstein is so un-balanced I have a strong desire to vomit.
Not that I have any feeling at all that Epstein didn't deserve what he got. My
disgust is that Roman Polanksi, who did exactly the same thing to a 13-year
old, was defended and lionized by a long list of entertainment world figures
after his arrest in Switzerland - many of whom are now falling all over
themselves to condemn Epstein.
If and when the mob howling over Epstein takes out after Polanki in the exact
same manner, then I'll take them seriously. Until then, they're a bunch of
virtue-signalling cretins.
Noel
'Twas back in 1993 when AOL joined USENET (I don't have an exact date) and the
joint was never the same since...
Me too!
These days, of course, it's been taken over by the spammer scum.
-- Dave
We gained computer pioneer John Mauchly on this day in 1907; he was best known
as the co-inventor of ENIAC, one of the world's first computers.
-- Dave
We gained Marvin Minsky on this day in 1927; he was an AI researcher,
computer scientist, invented neural networks etc, and is now thought to be
cryogenically preserved.
-- Dave
Dedicated on this day in 1944, it was conceived by Dr. Howard Aiken; the
Wikipedia entry for it has a fascinating history, and it's a wonder that
it worked at all!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Mark_I
-- Dave
We lost computer pioneer Edsger Dijkstra in 2002; he gave us ALGOL,
structured programming, semaphores, and ranted against the GOTO statement
(much to the distress of the Fortranites and their spaghetti coding). Oh,
and a certain Prof. Goto used to complain that everybody wanted to
eliminate him :-)
However, we gained Jon Postel in 1943; with umpteen RFCs to his name, he
could pretty much be described as the Father of the Internet (but note
that he edited most of the RFCs, not authored them, but deserves credit
all the same).
-- Dave
We lost him in 2007; he was known for working with monitors and concurrent
programming etc, and authored "Operating System Principles" and "The
Architecture of Concurrent Programs".
-- Dave
A computer pioneer, he is credited with the invention of core memory;
fascinating stuff, when you realise that a "read" involves a couple of
write cycles :-) Sense windings, etc...
And 386BSD was released on this day in 1992, when William and Lynne Jolitz
started the Open Source movement; well, that's what my notes say, and
corrections are welcome (I know that Gilmore likes to take credit for just
about everything).
-- Dave
Roberto Mario "Robert" Fano (11 November 1917 – 13 July 2016) was an
Italian-American computer scientist and professor of electrical
engineering and computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fano
Robert Fano, computing pioneer and founder of CSAIL, dies at 98
Professor emeritus helped launch field of information theory and
developed early time-sharing computers.
http://news.mit.edu/2016/robert-fano-obituary-0715
Tom Van Vleck just passed this on the Multics mailing list. Fernando
Corbató has passed away at 93.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/science/fernando-corbato-dead.html
Clem organized the wonderful Unix 50 event at the LCM two days ago, where
we saw a working 6180 front panel on display (backed by a virtual DPS-8m
running Multics!).
This is our heritage and our history, let us not forget where we came from.
- Dan C.
A combination of both an extended back-hoe fade and me accidentally
blocking Minnie :-(
(This is also a test to see if I'm still on COFF, as it's a fairly quiet
list.)
-- Dave
Greetings,
I'm looking for a list of all hard disk drives that DEC supported prior to
~1970 or so as part of some research I'm doing for my talk this fall in
Lillehammer. so far, I've only found one listed in a pdp-9 brochure (the
RB09 listed in the PDP-9 handbook). Are there others? I've seen a reference
to an RA01, but have seen no details on it. It appears that Rx## is the
pattern to look for in that era.
Alternatively, if someone can articulate the XX## naming scheme of the
time, that would be great. I've seen Dx## for different communications
modules, for example, but don't know if I can generalize.
Warner
We really should take this off-list if you want to continue the discussion
as it has little to do with simh and more history (so I'm CCing the TUHS
COFF list. I'll include simh for now, but if you reply please kill the
simh part).
An Eagle or Eagle-II was a whole lot lighter (and physically smaller) than
an RP06 or RP07 (or an RM series drive for that matter). It is interesting
to hear you had problems with the Eagles. They were generally considered
the best/most reliable of the day. The SI controller on the Vax was less
so, although many of us in the UNIX community used them.
FWIW: I was accused of jinxing the 19" SMD Ampex drive by Masscomp's field
service team. The story is we could never make the Ampex drives work
reliably at UCB (they were cheaper in bytes/$ than the Eagles at the
time). When I was being recruited to Masscomp as I was leaving UCB, they
were trying to use Ampex as their high-end SMD drive with the Xylogic 440
controller, but had not (yet) had a failure. [Xylogic, like Masscomp, was
ex-DEC folks]. Anyway, I had mentioned @ UCB we had given up on the Ampex
drive on our Vaxen, and within 2 weeks of my starting to work darned near
all of them that Masscomp owned had failed.
PC (Paul Cantrell), tjt and I did eventually make them work but only after
we got Xylogic to redesign the 440 to be the 450 controllers and PC spend
hours with the microcode team on the error recovery logic. Funny, the
450/Eagle combination (and later Xylogic 472 tape) became the de rigor in
the UNIX community.
BTW: if Mark and the simh team is to ever to create a solid
Sun/Masscomp/Apollo simulator, they will need to emulate the Xylogic
controller family. One more thing for the forever growing list of things
I'd like to do when I retire, but I think I still have the engineering
specs for them and PC and tjt are still to be found ;-)
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 9:19 AM Tim Wilkinson <tjw(a)twsoft.co.uk> wrote:
> Back in 85 have had applications to purchase a 785 – 780-750-730 then 725
> rejected, we were fortunately given a 750 by a sister company who were
> upgrading to a 785, but they took their disks. So we had to buy for
> ourselves.
>
>
>
> To keep the bean counter happy we went for a System Industries controller
> and 4 super Eagles.
>
>
>
> But back then there was a problem with the eagles and all 4 had to be
> swapped out 4 times.
>
>
>
> Carrying them up stairs to the computer room was not fun. The platter size
> may have been reduced. But the weight!!!
>
>
>
> Tim
>
> *From:* Simh [mailto:simh-bounces@trailing-edge.com] *On Behalf Of *Clem
> Cole
> *Sent:* 01 July 2019 14:08
> *To:* Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)computer-refuge.org>
> *Cc:* SIMH <simh(a)trailing-edge.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Simh] Which PDP-11 to choose
>
>
>
> I can not say why it followed that naming convention, but it did. The
> drives of that day were referred to as 19" technology since that's how they
> mounted. FWIW: Most manufacturers at the time used the same platter
> size as the original IBM 1311 (which as you pointed out was 14"), but not
> everyone, for instance, the Fujitsu Eagle used 10.5-inch platter. FWIW:
> I answered a bunch of this in:
> https://www.quora.com/How-do-hard-drives-get-smaller-and-smaller-in-size-bi…
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:52 AM Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)computer-refuge.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:32 AM Clem cole <clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
>
> 19” form factor for the disks drive fir the space in the 19” relay rack.
> You’re right the platters themselves were smaller. The disks were referred
> too by the mechanical FF. 19, 8, 5.25 etc.
>
>
>
> But, 8" hard drives have 8" platters, and 5.25" hard drives have 5.25"
> platters. The casing on a the 5.25" drive in front of me is almost 6" wide.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai…>
> <#m_1729574511750107707_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
(More of a test to see if I'm still subscribed; a long story - see TUHS
for more details.)
Sir Maurice Wilkes FRS FREng was born on this day in 1913; he was involved
with EDSAC, microprogramming, etc.
Now, if I'm still subscribed then this will appear; if it has gone
post-only for me (as TUHS has) then it won't come back to me, and if I'm
no longer subscribed then it should bounce with an URL...
-- Dave
>Now, if I'm still subscribed then this will appear; if it has gone post-only for me (as TUHS >has) then it won't come back to me, and if I'm no longer subscribed then it should bounce >with an URL...
Maybe its a matter of electronic delay. Like with old tube
televisions, a good bang on top and all works again ... mostly :-)
Cheers,
uncle rubl
I just finished reading "Life under the Sun" by David Yen, a 296-page
collection of anecdotes in historical order covering his 20y at Sun. An
amusing, and sometimes sad, read.
Here are two: (1) During the Serengeti project, Sunsoft lost the only
person who knew FORTH and they waited two months to find someone to
modify the OBF. (2) Google's purchasing dep't rejected their engineers'
purchase requisitions for T1 machines because they were single-sourced,
despite running their search s/w six times faster than comparably priced
Intel boxes.
N.