Can people **please** send posts to one of these two lists, only? Having to go
through and delete every other post (yeah, I know, I could relete _all_
messages to either list, since they are archived, but old habits are hard to
break) is _really_ annoying.
OK, I can see sending an _initial_ query to both lists, to get it to as wide
a circle as possible: _but_ BCC at least one of them, to prevent lazy people
just hitting 'reply all' and thereby sanding out multiple copies of their
reply.
Thank you.
Noel
3BSD has the V7 scheme, the new kernel code where there is a group list in
the process is not introduced until later/
ᐧ
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:46 PM Henry Bent <henry.r.bent(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:31, Clem Cole <clemc(a)ccc.com> wrote:
>
>> Grant,
>>
>> Mashey and crew basically did most of the original group work as part of
>> PWB. If you look at the Sixth Edition sources and the PWB 1.0 stuff, that
>> is one of the places you will find differences. With Seventh Edition (or I
>> believe as part of the UNIX/TS work that Ken picked up), the Mashey group
>> changes went back into the Research stream. With one of the predecessors to
>> 4.2BSD (it may have 4.1A or 4.1B but frankly I have forgotten) Joy
>> introduced the group scheme we all use today.
>>
>>
> Looking at the TUHS archives, unless I'm missing something, 3BSD has
> groups that appear to be in the modern format:
>
> % ls -l /bsd/3bsd/etc/group
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 44 1980-01-02 22:08 /bsd/3bsd/etc/group
> % cat /bsd/3bsd/etc/group
> staff:*:10:bill,ozalp
> grad:*:20:
> prof:*:30:
> % find . -name 'chgrp*' | xargs ls -l
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 6960 Dec 30 1979 ./usr/bin/chgrp
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 26 Feb 12 1979 ./usr/man/man1/chgrp.1
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 754 Feb 12 1979 ./usr/src/cmd/chgrp.c
>
> -Henry
>