[TUHS] Is it time to resurrect the original dsw (delete with switches)?
steffen at sdaoden.eu
Tue Aug 31 23:18:46 AEST 2021
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20210830150510.jWrRZ%steffen at sdaoden.eu>:
|Jon Steinhart wrote in
| <202108292212.17TMCGow1448973 at darkstar.fourwinds.com>:
||I recently upgraded my machines to fc34. I just did a stock
||uncomplicated installation using the defaults and it failed miserably.
||Fc34 uses btrfs as the default filesystem so I thought that I'd give it
|I have learned that i have to chattr +C my vm/ directory in order
|to avoid filesystem errors which can only be solved by deleting
|the corrupted files (which were not easy to find out,
|inspect-internal inode-resolve could have helped a bit better, but
|creator itself. So i think a "chattr +C" here and there, it can
|be directory-wide, it could be a mount or creation option, isn't
|that bad. Also it is just me having had a go (or julia or nim; or
Only to add that this was effectively my fault, because of the
caching behaviour my box-vm.sh script chose for qemu.
In effect i think that +C i could drop again now that i have
drivecache=,cache=writeback # ,cache=none XXX on ZFS!?
used like eg
It, however, took quite some research to get there.
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
More information about the TUHS