[TUHS] [SPAM] Re: SCCS
dot at dotat.at
Mon Sep 16 20:59:35 AEST 2019
Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:
> I was thinking of an intermediate router (probably one that you never knew
> about) corrupting the checksum-less UDP packet, recalculating the Ethernet
> checksum, and your kernel happily accepting it; you now have an application
> that fails for some unknown reason.
> Never seen it in practice, but I've heard of it happening.
This paper has some examples:
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Forth, Tyne, West Dogger: Westerly 3 to 5 veering northwesterly 4 to 6. Slight
or moderate, becoming moderate or rough except in west Forth. Mainly fair.
More information about the TUHS