[TUHS] [SPAM] Re: SCCS
lm at mcvoy.com
Sat Sep 14 01:23:45 AEST 2019
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 06:00:09PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2019-Sep-13 15:54:32 +1000, Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:
> >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >> But here is an SCCS win. SCCS has a 16 bit ignore the carry bit
> >> checksum over the whole file. RCS has none of that.
> >Giggle... I found I could actually *edit* an SCCS file, provided I reset
> >the checksum to zero (it was then recalculated).
> I think that was deliberate. ISTR editing SCCS files and repairing the
> checksum as well, though I don't recally exactly how.
bk admin -z file.c
and I'm pretty sure that is sccs compat.
> >> B) NFS errors. So all NFS implementations, Suns included, had a bad
> >> habit of returning a block of nulls. I dunno why but that is a thing.
> >> The SCCS checksum would detect that. RCS and CVS did not have a
> >> checksum so when NFS returned garbage, they were happy to return that to
> >> you.
> >I believe that NFS is much more reliable now (yes, it used to be awful).
> NFS ran much faster when you turned off the UDP checksums as well.
> (Though there was still the Ethernet CRC32).
More information about the TUHS