bakul at bitblocks.com
Fri Sep 13 15:50:12 AEST 2019
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:58 +1000 Dave Horsfall <dave at horsfall.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > Yeah, this was one of things that BitKeeper addressed. It was easier to
> > use and every commit was a tag.
> That reminds me: I really must take another look at BK for my stuff.
> At the moment I'm using say "fred.c-" for the previous version etc (and
> "fred.c+" for something finished but not quite ready to install).
> I've also renamed entire directory trees to sub-tree under "OLD" etc :-)
> SCCS/RCS are history as far as I'm concerned; I never quite got the hang
> of CVS (which OpenLDAP uses); and I've heard all sorts of horror stories
> about GIT to keep me away from it...
I used to know CVS quite well. Then I switched to mercurial
(for my own projects). Then to git. git has its problems but
it has worked well enough. With just a few commands you can
get a lot done with it. If you rely on/ contribute to any
open source projects, you pretty much have to know it these
More information about the TUHS