[TUHS] Happy birthday, Morris worm
imp at bsdimp.com
Sat Nov 16 00:39:57 AEST 2019
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019, 7:32 AM Doug McIlroy <doug at cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> > That was the trouble; had he bothered to test it on a private network (as
> > if a true professional would even consider carrying out such an act)[*]
> > would've noticed that his probability calculations were arse-backwards
> Morris's failure to foresee the results of even slow exponential
> growth is matched by the failure of the critique above to realize
> that Morris wouldn't have seen the trouble in a small network test.
> The worm assured that no more than one copy (and occasionally one clone)
> would run on a machine at a time. This limits the number of attacks
> that any one machine experiences at a time to roughly the
> number of machines in the network. For a small network, this will
> not be a major load.
> The worm became a denial-of-service attack only because a huge
> number of machines were involved.
> I do not remember whether the worm left tracks to prevent its
> being run more than once on a machine, though I rather think
> it did. This would mean that a small network test would not
> only behave innocuously; it would terminate almost instantly.
it had code to do that, but IIRC, there were bugs in that code that
prevented it being completely effective in some cases... the sorts of
cases, though, that a small scale test wouldn't likely catch.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the TUHS