[TUHS] C Threading
imp at bsdimp.com
Sat Jun 30 02:59:03 AEST 2018
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:27 AM, <ron at ronnatalie.com> wrote:
> Thread local storage and starting threads up is largely a rather
> inconsequential implementation detail. When it comes down to actual
> parallel programming, of which I have done more than a little, the big
> is thread synchronization. It's rather hardware dependent. You can
> pretty much entirely wipe out any parallism gains with a synchronization
> call that results in a context switch or even a serious cache impact. On
> one side you have machines like the Denelcor HEP where every memory word
> a pair of semaphores on it and the instructions could stall the process
> while waiting for them and the hardware would schedule the other threads.
> On the other hand you have your x86, which you can do a few clever things
> with some atomic operations and inlined assembler but a lot of the
> "standard" (boost, pthread, etc...) synchs will kill you.
C11 also defines thread APIs and atomic operations sufficient to do many
types of locking. POSIX layers on threads as well that could be implemented
using those atomics.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the TUHS