[TUHS] origins of void* -- Apology!
cym224 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 9 02:07:10 AEST 2017
On 6 November 2017 at 19:36, Ron Natalie <ron at ronnatalie.com> wrote:
> It’s worse than that. “char” is defined as neither signed nor unsigned.
> The signedness is implementation defined. This was why we have the inane
> “signed” keyword.
What was that story about porting an early UNIX to a machine with
different char polarity? I dimly recall only a few problems.
More information about the TUHS