[TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other

Steve Nickolas usotsuki at buric.co
Wed Feb 22 06:28:13 AEST 2017

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Larry McVoy wrote:

> In terms of crash worthyness, ext2 was better.  I think the ext2 people
> took the approach that they wanted to be as robust as dos but with
> performance.  And they made it, it's some very nice work.

Wouldn't "as robust as DOS" be a *bad* thing?


More information about the TUHS mailing list