[TUHS] Scan of "Edition 0" manual
charles.unix.pro at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 04:47:57 AEST 2015
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Doug McIlroy <doug at cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> > It might not be so much a set of macros as just using a
> > subset of raw groff.
> Yes, there were no macros back then. If you format the
> document using raw groff, the odds are that you will be
> speaking the same roff that Dennis did.
> > Doug having been there, might know/remember the actually lineage.
> Aside from some fuzziness about who wrote what and in what
> language, here's what happened:
> To port Jerry Saltzer's Runoff (presumably written in MAD)
> to Multics, either Dennis or Bob Morris or both together
> reimplemented it (presumably in PL/I). To coexist with
> Saltzer's version on CTSS, the new program needed a
> distinct name, hence roff.
> The early Multics PL/I compiler was far from a production
> tool. Justifiably, the Bell Labs comp center didn't
> support it. To get roff into general use at the Labs,
> I undertook yet another implementation in BCPL. I added
> functionality (number registers, three-part headings, etc)
> and kept the new name. Molly Wagner added hyphenation.
> Eventually, I added macros that were usable either as
> commands or (when parameterless) embedded in text.
>From Multics 12.5:
// Roff for MULTICS
// The first ROFF for Multics was written in March, 1969, by
// Doug McIlroy of Bell Labs. Art Evans made extensive
// modifications to it in May and June, 1969, adding many
// comments and making various changes.
// Footnoting added by Dennis Capps in 1970.
// Maintained by Harwell Thrasher in 1971.
// Many new features added and bugs fixed by R Mabee in 1971-1972.
// RUNOFF and BCPL were brought over to the 6180 Multics (from 645) in May
of 1973 by R F Mabee.
The string 'macro" does not appear in the Multics runoff source.
> An interesting question of priority is whether nroff or
> BCPL roff was first to have a macro capability. Though
> I don't remember for sure, the fact that BCPL roff unified
> registers, macros, strings and diversions suggests that
> I abstracted from nroff facilities.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the TUHS