[TUHS] History of #! interpretation in Unix
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Mon Jan 17 07:37:38 AEST 2011
Sven Mascheck scripsit:
> who (or what system) do you mean was the 2nd?
That was hypothetical.
Trying again: "It's unlikely that two different people chose #! as the
executable-script mark independently."
> With /bin/sh you actually meant any shell calling "itself"?
> Otherwise I'm afraid, I have some difficulties following you.
I mean that whereas (t)csh uses /bin/sh to run scripts with no
shebangs, the Posix-compatible shells execute scripts with no
shebangs directly. And this is Bad.
> > IMHO the Posix sh definition should be extended so that all
> > shells claiming Posix-compliance should do shebangs.
> Shells themselves should implement it, not the kernel?
It might be too much to ask the kernel to do, especially on
non-traditional Posix systems like z/OS.
> There was a working group resolution to standardize #!, which didn't
> make it, http://www.opengroup.org/platform/resolutions/bwg2000-004.html
> you could chime in
I see the problem now: a portable awk script, for example, can't assume
that the Posix awk is in /usr/bin/awk, so "#!/usr/bin/awk" might get the
wrong awk. So the feature is not worth standardizing for Posix.
[W]hen I wrote it I was more than a little John Cowan
febrile with foodpoisoning from an antique carrot cowan at ccil.org
that I foolishly ate out of an illjudged faith http://ccil.org/~cowan
in the benignancy of vegetables. --And Rosta
More information about the TUHS