Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> wrote:OK, then Gosling just had the idea of including lisp.
>
> > On 26 Feb 2017, at 14:54, Joerg Schilling <schily@schily.net> wrote:
> >
> > GNU EMACS is based on the Gosling EMACS and this did already include the LISP
> > interpreter.
>
> Well, Gosling Emacs had mocklisp which, despite its name, isn't a Lisp. GNU Emacs has elisp which *is* a Lisp (albeit a fairly horrid one).