On 26 February 2017 at 07:46, Michael Kjörling <michael@kjorling.se> wrote:
On 26 Feb 2017 07:39 -0500, from jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa):
I was never happy with the size of EMACS, and it had nothing to do with the
amount of memory resources used. That big a binary implies a very large amount
of source, and the more lines of code, the more places for bugs...
But remember; without Emacs, we might never have had _The Cuckoo's
Egg_. Imagine the terror of that loss.
Hhhmmm.... I must dig my copy out of storage because I do not remember
emacs in there.
As for emac uses, my wife was on (non-CS) staff at a local college
affiliated with U of T. At the time, DOS boxes sat on staff desks and
email was via a telnet connection to an SGI box somewhere on campus.
A BATch file connected and ran pine but shelled out to an external
editor. What was the editor? Well, I saw her composing a message
once and ending the editor session by ^X^C.
N.