I've forgotten the details now, so I'll have look at the prints when I get home, but think i remember that Ken had a strap on the DHDM that corrected this. But I do remember the discussion. I have not idea where it was. I have a file of 'coms stuff' at home (paper of course). I'll look to see if it's in there.
Reading the McNamara interview, sadly he (like many folks) considered the DZ to have modem control. It had >>partial<< support, while the DH (with the DM option) had full. The difference is important.
Dave Cane (HW lead on the 750) used the DZ as his model for the original MC-500 serial ports -- what a mess. Here it is be had a real-time machine and could not keep the clock straight for the first couple of versions of the OS because the HW was dorked. [Later systems did it properly].
Clem