> On 7 Dec 2024, at 13:34, Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also interesting; I wonder if the "capability to run multiple MS-DOS applications under Unix" was shipped in a functional form, and what relation it might or might not have had to what was running on the AT&T hardware.
I used to run an 80286 “Taiwan clone” (as we called them in Italy) with Xenix 286 and, later, its 386 version which was SCO by then (memory a bit fuzzy on when Xenix became SCO Xenix and the Unix) and I definitely could run MS-DOS programs on the 386 - you would use the dos command which mapped drives either to physical drives (i.e. A: was the floppy) or directories within the filesystem.
It was often used for businesses which had their inventory on MS-DOS bespoke software but wanted to “multitask” so we had some very dirty code which would run the DOS program on the serial terminals writing to a “network” drive which was actually a directory in the Unix filesystem.
Interesting, thank you for the explanation. How was file locking handled for DOS programs? Did it have some sort of internal call to "share" or was there a more elegant method?
-Henry