On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:
Am I the only one that remembers realloc() being buggy on some systems?
Amen... it was rarely useful. I always found realloc to one of the part I could never trust. I do remember what you got back from any of the malloc calls could vary widely. Particularly pre-ANSI C and working on non-UNIX systems.
Malloc in general was always a tarbaby because there were (are) so many implementations "in the wild." I used to advise our application people to create something that was application specific and then call the local malloc under the covers, but the chances that a general malloc implementation would be optimal for your code was low.