> From: John Cowan
> That's always true on the PDP-11 and Vax ... because the processor
> architecture (which has pre-increment and post-decrement instructions,
> but not their counterparts)
After Doug's message, I carefull re-read this, and I'm not sure it's correct?
The PDP-11 has pre-decrement and post-increment, not the other way around (as
above) - unless I'm misunderstanding what you meant by those terms?
That's why:
*p++ = 0;
turns (if p is in R2) into
CLR (R2)+
R2 is used, and then incremented after it has been used.
This quirk of the PDP-11 is why I still prefer post-increment and pre-decrement in my code... even though there's no chance in hades that my code will ever run there...
Warner