There was never a System IV and System III was purely marketing, look at the docs it's PWB 3.0 but the few AT&T marketing/branding folks around didn't want to use the term 'Programmer' when it tried to compete with IBM (which was Charlie Brown - AT&T CEO - dream in those days).  As I understand it, the issue was that said folks wanted to sell to commercial sites (and in particular the 3B20S), and naming the software to drive with a term like 'programmer' would be a turn-off for less technical (traditional big blue) customers.

As for why PWB 4.0 never got released I believe that was there was a lag between what Summit (NJ) did as the 'UNIX Support Group' and what was being released as 'product' (NC).  Remember this is all part of the post-Judge Green world @ AT&T and things were not really smooth.  >>>my impression<< (and like you would love to know more), was that the release of PWB 3.0 was part of the pre-consent decree SW release rules, and by the time of System V, it was full steam ahead.  PWB 4.0 was finished up during that funny period between the two.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 3:38 PM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
So I've seen a number of places that talk about Unix TS 3.0 -> 4.0 -> 5.0 progression and how System III was released and System V was released and System IV was internal only.

What I've not seen is the "why" part of this. Why was it internal only?

Warner