On Sunday, March 26, 2017, Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 09:26:00AM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> P.S. A fun example of the simplicity of the
> plan9 network API is this implementation of rlogin:
> http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/rsc/rlogin
So while that is really neat, I personally think that's part of why Plan 9
didn't take off. It's too clever, at least for me. I know the rlogin
code pretty well and if you showed me that code and asked me what it was,
without the comments, I don't think I would have put it together. On
the other hand, show me the C code and I'd be able to figure it out.
It's perhaps because I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I really
like how blindingly obvious a lot of the original Unix code was. Not saying
it was all that way, but a ton of it was sort of what you would imagine it
to be before you saw it. Which means I understood it and could bugfix it.
A lot of original UNIX code was simple, but we ended up with 272 lines of
bloat in echo.c[1]. That bloat started to creep in already in the beginning
when Rob Pike formulated his famous presentation on cat(1)[2]. I also
think that sockets implementation was the turning point.
Plan 9 was probably the last truly dedicated effort to keep it simple using
the UNIX way of doing things. I much prefer reading its code than GNU
or FreeBSD. I think the world really needs a Unix operating system which
is as simple and elegant as Plan 9.
--Andy