I agree with Rob. I fear the OP might have more limited experience with what was available at the time and how it was developed. The following is undoubtedly incomplete. It is what I could remember quickly to answer the question of real compilers for the PDP-11.

As others have pointed out, the original DEC PDP-11 FTN, like the original PDP-6 and PDP-8, was based on threaded DEC F4 technology.  After introducing the PDP-10, the 36-bit compiler team at DEC started a project to rewrite FORTRAN (in BLISS) as a true compiler.  As was reminded at lunch last week (I still eat weekly with many of the DEC TLG folks), DEC had two groups -- a development team and a support team.    I think some of the external confusion comes from both teams releasing products to the world, and the outside world did not always understand the differences. So, when I say the "compiler" group, I generally refer to the former - although many people started in the latter and eventually became part of the former. They key point here is that F4 (which was from the support folks), lived for a while in parallel with stuff coming from what eventually would become TLG [Technical Languages (and tools) Group].

The primary DEC-supported technical languages were all written in BLISS-11 and cross-compiled from the PDP-10 (originally).  However, they could run in 11/40 class (shared I/D) space machines. Remember, DEC operating systems could do overlays - although there were probably some differences with what could be generated [I'd need to pull the old RT11 manuals for each]. Yes, FORTRAN was the primary technical language, but DEC's TLG supported other languages for the PDP-11 from COBOL to BASIC, and 3rd parties filled out the available suite.

Probably the #1 3rd party, PDP-11 compiler, is (was) the OMSI Pascal compiler (which generated direct PDP-11 code) for all classes of PDP-11s [the OP referred to the Pascal that generated P4 code and ran interpreter for same.  The UCSD Pascal worked this way, but I never saw anything other than students use it for teaching, while the OMSI compiler was a force for PDP-11 programmers, and you saw it in many PDP-11 shops - including some I worked].  I'm pretty sure the RT11 and  RSX11 versions of this can be easily found in the wild, but I have not looked for the UNIX version (note that there was one).

Note - from a SW marketplace for PDP-11s, the money was on the DEC operating systems, not UNIX.  So, there was little incentive to move those tools, which I think is why the OP may not have experienced them.  Another important political thing to consider is that TLG did their development on PDP-10s and later Vaxen inside DEC.   Since everything was written in BLISS and DEC marketing 100% missed/sunk that boat, the concept of self-hosting the compiler was not taken seriously (ISTR: there was a project to make it self-host on RSX, but it was abandoned since customers were not beating DEC's door down for BLISS on many PDP-11 systems).

Besides DMR's compiler for the PDP-11.  Steve Johnson developed PCC and later PCC2.  Both ran on all flavors of PDP-11s, although I believe since the lack of support for overlays in the research UNIX editions limited the compilers and ISTR, there were both 11/40 and 11/45 class binaries with different-sized tables.

On our Unix boxes, we also had a PDP-11 Pascal compiler from Free University in Europe (VU) - I don't remember much about it nor can I find it in a quick search of my currently online stuff. ISTR That one may have been 11/45 class - we had it on the TekLabs 11/70 and I don't remember having in on any of our 40-class systems.

The Whitesmith's C has been mentioned.  That compiler ran on all the PDP-11 UNIXs of the day, plus its native Idris, as well as the DEC OSs.  It did not use an interpreter per se, but instead compiled to something Plauger called 'ANAT" - a natural assembler.  He then ran an optimizer over this output and his final pass converted from ANAT code to the PDP-11 (or Z80 as it turns out).  I argue that ANAT was what we now think of in modern compilers as the IL, but others might argue differently. We ran it on our RT-11 systems, although ISTR came with the UNIX version, so we had it on the 11/70, too. That may have been because we used it to cross-compile for the Z80.

Tannabaum and the team have the Amsterdam compiler toolkit. This had front ends for C and Pascal and could generate code for PDP-11s and several other microprocessors. I do not know how widely it was used for the PDP11s.

Per Brinch, Hansen also implemented Parallel Pascal and his own OS for the 40-class PDP-11s. He talks about this in his book Pascal on Small Systems. 

Holt and team wrote Concurrent Euclid and TUNIS for the 40-class machines.

Wirth released a Modula for the 11, although we mostly ran it on the 68000s and a Lilith system.

IIRC, Mike Malcom and the team built a true B compiler so they could develop Thoth.   As the 11/40 was one of the original Thoth target systems,  I would have expected that to exist, but I have never used it.

As was mentioned before, there was  BCPL for the PDP-11.  I believe that a BCPL compiler can even be found on one of the  USENIX tapes in the TUHS archives, but I have not looked.  

Finally, ISTR, in the mid-late 1970s one of the Universities in Europe (??Edinburgh, maybe??), developed and released an Algol flavor for the PDP-11, but I never used it.   Again, you might want to check the TUHS archives.  In my own case, while I had used Algol on the PDP-8s and 10s, plus the IBM systems, and by then Pascal had become the hot alternative language and was close enough I never had a desire/need for it.   Plus since there were a number of Pascal implementations available for 11s and no one in Teklabs was asking for it, I never chased it down.

To quote Tom Lehrer .. "These are the only ones that the news has come to Huvrd. There may be many others ..."

Clem